KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

Stan what stadium would you have liked the club to proceed with?

The north stand is terrible but that was a much smaller stand than the centenary when they put the third tier on I cannot imagine a third tier on the centenary I have been on the second tier maybe three or four times and it's very high but just about acceptable

Barcelona are increasing capacity by 15k seats, most people at the back of stadium can't see the ball now so if it's okay for them.

Ideally new build at speke but otherwise Stanley park new build 65k with options in the design to go to 90k if we need it.

Paid for by long term debenture or preference share or loan over 25 to 40 years

Well thankfully you are in a tiny minority of fans.

I have to say having being on the upper tier in croke park numerous times i thinks its a great view and id would say the height is similar. But for older people i can see how they would find the view bad

I was gonna mention croke park myself. It being a bigger pitch as well and there's no bad view

One question: how can you build a 90k stadium and have great views from every seat?

Never been to Croke park so can't comment but I have been on the third tier of the north stand st old Trafford and upper tier of the centenary and another tier on that would be some way from the pitch and for what ?

To make John Henry more money ? Purpose build grounds are designed to give the optimum view and they do the millennium stadium being a prime example 80k and every seat a good view the new wembley also 100k trying to build of hotchpotch overlaying an old design like anfield is crazy I don't care what anyone says. The more this debate goes on the more I am convinced. And I thank the witty poster who says I am too old to see firstly insults always show the person has lost the argument also are we saying john Henry's new stadium is only for rich 19 years olds with fat wallets and perfect eyesight ?