KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 9 of 103 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 102 103
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
We can though, because there are common factors. For example the percentage of commercial opportunities taken.


This.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
Whatever
. Sorry sixties, but this seems like the reply of someone who has no valid argument to put forward.


Sign Reus
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
At everyone

The commercial opportunities back then to present day are worlds apart !
therefore it's an unfair argument isn't it ? FSG should be doing better they have better opportunities now than when mores was in control ! Not defending him but that's the truth of it ! ignore it if you like just to argue a point unfairly for cheap kudos! is that LFC fans now ?


They are worlds apart but Moores let the club stagnate and H&G almost brought the club to administration. FSG have been extremely proactive in terms of increasing club sponsors and our commercial revenue will have risen far above what inflation or just general business conditions are.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Have you got evidence to back that statement about FSG's doing better than inflation and the general prem market up Maxi ?

Also LFC were not in administration or in danger of it for the see my previous 1000 posts on it.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 163
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 163
All finances and proof aside, if you compare the 3 at the basic level,

Moores - for whatever reason couldnt and / or didnt want to own Liverpool anymore and i dont want someone like the running the club.

H&G - were beyond useless and nearly destroyed our club, want that even less than the above scenario with Moores.

FSG - want to be here and want to do well at the moment and are building a club that have done better each year from the outside looking in, so for me they are the best of the 3.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Originally Posted By: danCrookes
All finances and proof aside, if you compare the 3 at the basic level,

Moores - for whatever reason couldnt and / or didnt want to own Liverpool anymore and i dont want someone like the running the club.

H&G - were beyond useless and nearly destroyed our club, want that even less than the above scenario with Moores.

FSG - want to be here and want to do well at the moment and are building a club that have done better each year from the outside looking in, so for me they are the best of the 3.
and that pretty much sums it up.


Sign Reus
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Have you got evidence to back that statement about FSG's doing better than inflation and the general prem market up Maxi ?

Also LFC were not in administration or in danger of it for the see my previous 1000 posts on it.


Inflation is easy to distinguish and considering the massive jumps we've made inthe last 2/3 years as an accountant I'm sure you'd be aware that it is above a rough inflation rate of 1-3% over the last few years

The other fact comes from the fact that we are getting more commercial revenue relative to other teams without champions league football. Hence general business conditins

Iv seen your posts. I will take the opinions of a man actually involved in the club around the time as holding a little more water than your own though as I pointed out to you yesterday.

Last edited by Maxi88; 11/06/14 08:32 AM.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Have you got evidence to back that statement about FSG's doing better than inflation and the general prem market up Maxi ?

Also LFC were not in administration or in danger of it for the see my previous 1000 posts on it.


The evidence won't become public knowledge until the accounts are released, but I believe in the next two sets of financial figures you will see that FSG are closing the gap between us and the top clubs.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
No need for insults Maxi

Yes agreed we have probably beaten RPI inflation but so will more or less every prem club. For example are we getting better sponsorship deals than Man Utd and Aresenal for example I dont know ? If we are then its to FSG,s credit if not then they are just doing what any competant manager will do.

As for the administration which you keep mentioning LFC have traded profitably for the last 50 years and have never been in the remotest danger of administration the issue was gillet and hicks could not finance the RBS loan an entirely different scenario,


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
FSG are fantastic! laugh


Sign Reus
Page 9 of 103 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 102 103

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion