KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 9 of 12 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 12
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Originally Posted By: Hercules/AF 58
Originally Posted By: donno
Its great that its finally happening after all these years. And the best option by far is the one finally picked to be staying in anfield is great.

Yeah staying at Anfield has it’s charms donno, but at what cost if we cannot ever go beyond a 58,000 seater stadium. All the other great clubs of Europe have, or will soon have left us well behind. Building a fine and iconic new stadium in Stanley park was always the better option, and close enough to our original site, and before anyone jumps in with: what about the traffic congestion? I say: nip over to Dublin on All Ireland Final Day (next Septenber) when over 80,000 pour in to Dublin and the Croke Park Stadium in the city center location, and then talk to me about the problem of traffic congestion.


plenty of traffic congestion on any match day. All the roads around Croke Park all closed to traffic and all the major roads near it clogged up. I don't think traffic congestion is a real problem though as all events attracting massive numbers will lead to congestion of some description

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: lumba
Wanting the best for our club should be what we all want.


Or wanting the best for John Henry which it seems is some peoples motivation


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Wanting what is most realistic and sustainable for Liverpool that won't hinder our transfer activity going forward is what I want. You want a pipe dream as it stands

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
Stanley, how do you know 60k wont be enough in the future? Did you read the post about the expansion of OT? It says it is highly unlikely to ever happen due to the rail system in close proximity.


I dont know. But the point is we wont have the option to expand whereas with the stanley park new build we would. 60k might be enough for all time Marko but what happens if its not and in 20 years our rivals are having 90k or beyond. Both Manchester city and utd could go to 150k if demand was there but anfield does not have the space. Go on google earth and look


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Maxi88
Wanting what is most realistic and sustainable for Liverpool that won't hinder our transfer activity going forward is what I want. You want a pipe dream as it stands


Agreed which is why we have the wrong owners we needed owners who were prepared to inject capital we nevewr got that they may be great businessmen but actually thats the problem


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
Stanley, how do you know 60k wont be enough in the future? Did you read the post about the expansion of OT? It says it is highly unlikely to ever happen due to the rail system in close proximity.


I dont know. But the point is we wont have the option to expand whereas with the stanley park new build we would. 60k might be enough for all time Marko but what happens if its not and in 20 years our rivals are having 90k or beyond. Both Manchester city and utd could go to 150k if demand was there but anfield does not have the space. Go on google earth and look
150k? Ahhaha that is beyond insanity. Do some research.


Sign Reus
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Originally Posted By: Maxi88
Wanting what is most realistic and sustainable for Liverpool that won't hinder our transfer activity going forward is what I want. You want a pipe dream as it stands


+1

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
You are ignoring my point marko about flexiabilty yes I agree 150k is insanity but thats not the point the point is they COULD go from 75k to 90k to 120k to 150k. We are stuck at 58k for ever unless we demolish Anfield in 25 years time and build a new stadium now that WOULD be insanity.

You dont strike me as stupid therefore I must conclude you are avoiding the issue as it shows your beloved FSG in a bad light.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: Maxi88
Wanting what is most realistic and sustainable for Liverpool that won't hinder our transfer activity going forward is what I want. You want a pipe dream as it stands


Agreed which is why we have the wrong owners we needed owners who were prepared to inject capital we nevewr got that they may be great businessmen but actually thats the problem


so if they're great businessmen they must have brought something to LFC?

Do you know any owners out there willing to fund a brand new stadium?

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
Mirror image of what's happened at Boston with their renovations of that stadium. I personally don't want to leave anfield but at the same time would also like to compete in terms of stadia.


Read between my lines.
Page 9 of 12 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 12

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion