|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307 |
Which will bring us back to our capacity prior to all seating set up of the seventies and eighties ! same capacity but far greater revenue per seat. Will the redevelopment of the whole Anfield area result in Anfield having a scrap value in the future, similar but obviously not on a par with Highbury?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
No one is suggesting we expand Anfield to 90k right now Marko but we need the option to do so as all our rivals City, Utd and Aresenal will do because of the scope they have. Even after the nearby houses are knocked down Anfield is landlocked and I cannot see how they can expand beyond 60k. We are forever limited thanks to lack of ambition by FSG.
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Had they built the new stadia on stanley park that would have had the scope for expansion .
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205 |
No one is suggesting we expand Anfield to 90k right now Marko but we need the option to do so as all our rivals City, Utd and Aresenal will do because of the scope they have. Even after the nearby houses are knocked down Anfield is landlocked and I cannot see how they can expand beyond 60k. We are forever limited thanks to lack of ambition by FSG. You have some wild obsession with going bigger & bigger & bigger. 60k is a fantastic sized stadium and always will be. I don't mean this to come across as insulting, but you come across as a very spoiled little brat Stan - nothing is ever good enough. It's not very endearing.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
Wanting the best for our club should be what we all want.
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205 |
Wanting the best for our club should be what we all want. Ahh well, may as well get my whinge on then.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595 |
Its great that its finally happening after all these years. And the best option by far is the one finally picked to be staying in anfield is great. Yeah staying at Anfield has it’s charms donno, but at what cost if we cannot ever go beyond a 58,000 seater stadium. All the other great clubs of Europe have, or will soon have left us well behind. Building a fine and iconic new stadium in Stanley park was always the better option, and close enough to our original site, and before anyone jumps in with: what about the traffic congestion? I say: nip over to Dublin on All Ireland Final Day (next Septenber) when over 80,000 pour in to Dublin and the Croke Park Stadium in the city center location, and then talk to me about the problem of traffic congestion.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
No one is suggesting we expand Anfield to 90k right now Marko but we need the option to do so as all our rivals City, Utd and Aresenal will do because of the scope they have. Even after the nearby houses are knocked down Anfield is landlocked and I cannot see how they can expand beyond 60k. We are forever limited thanks to lack of ambition by FSG. You have some wild obsession with going bigger & bigger & bigger. 60k is a fantastic sized stadium and always will be. I don't mean this to come across as insulting, but you come across as a very spoiled little brat Stan - nothing is ever good enough. It's not very endearing. Thank you for your kind commenrs Mr Donut. I dont know how you know 60k always will be adequate for all time but it must be nice to have such vast knowledge.
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205 |
Come on Stan, a ground increase to 60k is nothing to be sniffed at, that's quite a high attendance. Realistically speaking, and without putting the club into a financial mess, 60k would be great for the club.
Take away the sugar daddies from football and that would look a lot better. We don't have owners that treat the team like a play thing, very few clubs do. We all want a 200,000 seater stadium where tickets cost a fiver and we have 30 world class players on our books, but that's just not reality - nor is it the norm.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791 |
Stanley, how do you know 60k wont be enough in the future? Did you read the post about the expansion of OT? It says it is highly unlikely to ever happen due to the rail system in close proximity.
Sign Reus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
