KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 11 12
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
With the new tv deals for premier league and CL mean that a clubs vast majority of income will now come from tv rather than the turnstiles. 60k seats with more corporate money coming in is fine and we don't have to spend £400m on it.
. OUCH! I know someone who will not be happy about you saying his contributions from match days will mean less to the club whilst sofa fans will mean more.

That aside, i think its a great day for Liverpool, club and city.


Without the people making personal sacrifices to attend anfield you would have no club to watch on your TV . What a disgusting comment mocking the reds at the game maybe you would be happier for the stadium to be empty and the camera just followed the pitch itself like some computer game.


Pack it in you two mad

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Believe it or not there is a world outside URL links

I think it's called the real world

There may be one but I can't think of a single stadia that has been redeveloped that is as good as a purpose built stadium old Trafford is awful as you would know if you ever went in the north stand.

Also £60k (phase 2) is pretty much the limit not good enough for a club of Liverpool's stature


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,365
C
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,365
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Believe it or not there is a world outside URL links

I think it's called the real world

There may be one but I can't think of a single stadia that has been redeveloped that is as good as a purpose built stadium old Trafford is awful as you would know if you ever went in the north stand.

Also £60k (phase 2) is pretty much the limit not good enough for a club of Liverpool's stature


Probably right Stan but nevertheless the whole regeneration project is a suitable compromise. Anfield is more than two stadiums, the bigger picture looks good for the area as it looks to attach itself back to the city. New stadia can be also terrible, reebok and riverside for example, placed in no mans land with no soul. Jees Istanbul attaturk was the worts new build eve seen, so much so galatasary moved out after one season.

The pubs and food outlets deserve the revamp as well, a lot of good could come out of this. Joe Anderson could leave a fantastic legacy on the forgotten part of the city

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
I agree out of town stadia like you have said Cp can be soulless but cities ground is pretty good and although I have not been I understand arsenals is good too

It's the seating position

Incidently I have brilliant seats in the middle of the lower centenary bang on the halfway line so for me personally better they redevelop

But not for the club in my view


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Believe it or not there is a world outside URL links

I think it's called the real world

There may be one but I can't think of a single stadia that has been redeveloped that is as good as a purpose built stadium old Trafford is awful as you would know if you ever went in the north stand.

Also £60k (phase 2) is pretty much the limit not good enough for a club of Liverpool's stature


That's the whole point SP, Old Trafford being awful but United being the club with the highest revenue, it's results/competitiveness on the field that's the most important. As we cannot have it both, I prefer to have a better team than a better stadium. Would you prefer to have a new top class stadium but having to pay twice the price for the ticket and not being able to buy top players?

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Personally i'd like an owner that has the means to do both,but maybe i just want too much.


That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: lumba
Personally i'd like an owner that has the means to do both,but maybe i just want too much.


Who wouldn't, but we don't and there are none lining up to take over.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
So you're saying we're doomed then Vish?

Last edited by lumba; 09/06/14 06:15 PM.

That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 791
S
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 791
Something that never gets a mention is the boxes. This new stand will effectively increase corporate revenue by 3.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: lumba
So you're saying we're doomed then Vish?


No, I am saying a redevelopment is good enough to be able to afford to stay competitive. Our objective was always 60k seats, if we get that even if not in a brand new stadium, but we are able to compete for players (unlike Arse with Emirates), I would be satisfied. I don't understand all the fuss about a new stadium with about the same capacity, we are not in the business of have the most beautiful stadium.

Page 4 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 11 12

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion