KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 … 17 18
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
KoK, look that's fair enough, but that's your opinion. I have put mine forward. No offence, but its pretty plain to see. We wanted Salah, the committee was not unanimous in their views, a meeting took place on the weekend, BR gets the funds to sign his man.

In anyone's book, that's the owners backing the manager.


Firstly, you don't have to explain that you mean no offence Marko & hopefully you understand that I mean none either, this is just a forum for us Liverpool fans to have a discussion on, doesn't mean we have to agree. That said, I think you're being a little delusional here mate. Liverpool inquired about a possible deal for Salah weeks ago but were put off by the asking price (believed to be around £18million), in that time obviously a lot of toing and froing has gone on and if this news is to believed then a value and/or price has been agreed, none of that suggests that FSG are ready to back their man. As Paddy said, sanctioning a £10million deal at this very moment is well bellow what they should be doing in order to secure a fourth place finish.

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,060
WNP Offline
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,060
So Chelsea's plan to win the title is to buy everyone we're linked with?

Good luck to them, they'll be signing 200 new players every window

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
actually pretty mad..window been open 3 weeks. if salah was a target why wait till mate is sold and chelsea casually rob him on us. crap fsg..maybe cissokko has a brother we can get on loan instead

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
With you there emp. All the talk was he was our primary target so why wit so long? If this is down to the "committee" then they all need sacking if we miss out.

It's still all rumours so I'm trying not to get angry about it but with the way we seem to work now, it's hard not to.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,185
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,185
The Chelsea rumours check out, they do sign everyone who scores against them.


Pete: Berg, I'm just not cut out to be a good person.
Berg: I know. That's why the Lord gave us good looks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkzkmyOln6I
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Tell you what, these Chelsea rumors would really put Marko's theory to the test, I almost want them to be true, then we'll all once and for all see the extent of FSG's ambition and ability to challenge financially, they're always talking about how we have the funds to challenge any team, well let's see it.

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,088
C
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,088
Why not bring back Assaidi instead? he looks to be an ok winger.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Originally Posted By: KingoftheKop
Tell you what, these Chelsea rumors would really put Marko's theory to the test, I almost want them to be true, then we'll all once and for all see the extent of FSG's ambition and ability to challenge financially, they're always talking about how we have the funds to challenge any team, well let's see it.


That's ridiculous, how would thattest my theory... Just because someone is willing to pay 50 mil for a volkswagen doesn't mean we should do the same if we only value him at 10. If BR was to pay 30 mil for Salah, I would be well and truly [oops] off.

Come on, you know better than that. We might not agree on FSG or this particular deal, but surely you can see that there has to be a limit as to how much we should pay.


Sign Reus
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Well you've twisted what I said there mate, I didn't mention £50million or £30million.

My point was that, if we've had a £10million bid accepted and Chelsea outbid us by say.. £2million, would FSG be prepared to back Rodgers by outbidding Chelsea? Of course I agree that there is/should be a limit to how much we should spend on players but to suggest £30million is blowing it out of proportion.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
fair enough, at 12 mil, I am sure they would back Rodgers...even at 15.....higher than that i don't know, but then again, at more than 15, i don't know if he's worth it.

If they didn't back him at 12-13, i would be very very disappointed.


Sign Reus
Page 3 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 … 17 18

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion