KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#382684 19/12/13 01:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
G
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
Director of football
Technical director
Transfer committee etc etc

Manager shud b allowed to sign and sell any players he wishes

If results are bad... Sack him... He is solely to blame

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,554
S
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,554
Those systems don't work.....in England

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 96
V
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
V Offline
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 96
BLLX post


COME ON YOU REDS !!!
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: gnp-uk
Director of football
Technical director
Transfer committee etc etc

Manager shud b allowed to sign and sell any players he wishes

If results are bad... Sack him... He is solely to blame

I often think these layers of bureaucracy are akin to layers of lead covering the owners arse from the ire of the fans.
Top managers don’t usually wear them, and with good reason as they just get in the way.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
the days of one man being able to make the decision to spend £100m on anyone he likes are finished, what's wrong with the manager sitting down with the chief scouts and a few other people to discuss transfer targets?

the Manager should always have the final word and the power to veto though.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
the days of one man being able to make the decision to spend £100m on anyone he likes are finished, what's wrong with the manager sitting down with the chief scouts and a few other people to discuss transfer targets?

the Manager should always have the final word and the power to veto though.

Whats wrong with is that it’s cumbersome, takes up scarce time, and often the Chairman/CEO takes their view’s over that of the manager, especially if their selection/decisions are deemed to be more cost effective...i.e cheaper.
And it costs money to have all these geezers hanging around trying to make themselves look good to the Chairman, often at the expense of the manager. An all round bad idea.

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
*
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
* Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
Originally Posted By: VEXED
BLLX post
i think its a good topic but its formatted as if a 2 year had written it

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Originally Posted By: Hercules/AF 58
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
the days of one man being able to make the decision to spend £100m on anyone he likes are finished, what's wrong with the manager sitting down with the chief scouts and a few other people to discuss transfer targets?

the Manager should always have the final word and the power to veto though.

Whats wrong with is that it’s cumbersome, takes up scarce time, and often the Chairman/CEO takes their view’s over that of the manager, especially if their selection/decisions are deemed to be more cost effective...i.e cheaper.
And it costs money to have all these geezers hanging around trying to make themselves look good to the Chairman, often at the expense of the manager. An all round bad idea.
i know for sure i would never give Dalglish 100 to spend with him being the sole decision maker again. Set us back a few years... I am a fan of the transfet comittee idea.


Sign Reus

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion