KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
He was originally on city's short list, that was confirmed by several sources, and I have no doubts there would be takers out there. I am also not a huge fan of long term contracts but I think it is crucial we retain the managerial stability and stability in general within the club.


Sign Reus
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
He was originally on city's short list, that was confirmed by several sources, and I have no doubts there would be takers out there. I am also not a huge fan of long term contracts but I think it is crucial we retain the managerial stability and stability in general within the club.

Yes stability at the club is important, though FSG appear to be new recruits to that idea!
However managers seldom walk out of clubs, unless it’s a row over investment and/or recruitment/roles and responsibilities, etc. So what are FSG worried about? Are they worried they’ll have to pay the going rate if he's successful?
Are they worried that if they continue the silly recruitment policy, he fails, and then he might walk in frustration?
There must be some compelling reason other than a sense of generosity as that wouldn’t be one of their vices!

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
G
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
Fsg offering br a new deal

WHY....

So br does not ask for 20/25m in jan to sign a quality quality player, who will demand serous wages

Fsg wud prefer br to sign 5/6 young players on low wages

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 172
X
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
X Offline
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 172
Originally Posted By: gnp-uk
Fsg offering br a new deal

WHY....

So br does not ask for 20/25m in jan to sign a quality quality player, who will demand serous wages

Fsg wud prefer br to sign 5/6 young players on low wages


second in the league after 1 season in charge, plus still only 41.

How can we not offer him a new contract, he has publicly stated we do not need any more youth players, he is after quality...he will have had xfer budgets set at the start of the season i.e. fighting for title 30mil+ xfers out, fighting for 4th 20mil etc...

RM, CM in jan and he will take us back to wear we belong.

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
G
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
And a quality striker to

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
In many ways BR is a lucky duck. the players he thought were good enough for liverpool fc like borini,aspas,allen have turned out to be nowhere near and he has had to scrap his tiki taka philosophy and relied on old boys gerrard/carra and unreal talent of suarez to get him through.

The good thing about him is he is not afraid to learn himself and plays good football too. the player he brings into CM will make or break him..fact is he should have done it already

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Originally Posted By: Hercules/AF 58
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
He was originally on city's short list, that was confirmed by several sources, and I have no doubts there would be takers out there. I am also not a huge fan of long term contracts but I think it is crucial we retain the managerial stability and stability in general within the club.

Yes stability at the club is important, though FSG appear to be new recruits to that idea!
However managers seldom walk out of clubs, unless it’s a row over investment and/or recruitment/roles and responsibilities, etc. So what are FSG worried about? Are they worried they’ll have to pay the going rate if he's successful?
Are they worried that if they continue the silly recruitment policy, he fails, and then he might walk in frustration?
There must be some compelling reason other than a sense of generosity as that wouldn’t be one of their vices!


Perhaps he has shown he is the right guy for the job and they don't wanna lose him to some poaching club..


Sign Reus
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416
Give him a new deal and be done with it, bet it wont be 5 years though, 3 seems to be fsgs method.


"Romance has broke down
This boy is crack'in up"

So not a moderator

Valar Morghulis
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
More than happy with a 3 year extension. With manager's salaries going at similar rates to players at most top clubs, I can't see the sense in having to pay out a galactic pay-off if it some how does go pear shaped.


Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

George Washington
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
I would hope we don't give out a new contract before January, things could go very wrong or very right in December.

Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion