BR used the 442 format against Fulham and it worked but can say whether it was more effective than the 352 since Fulham was not a good benchmark team to measure this.
What do you guys think?
Which format suit us better if all our players are fit?
Perhaps against top teams or playing away, we should use the 442?
I like the looks of that. I think 4 at the back is better, and I think Agger needs to be there. That combination has earned us all of our clean sheets. 3 at the back is interesting, but I don't think it should be plan a. I also think 4-4-2 is dated. I like the 4-3-3.
BR used the 442 format against Fulham and it worked but can say whether it was more effective than the 352 since Fulham was not a good benchmark team to measure this.
What do you guys think?
Which format suit us better if all our players are fit?
Perhaps against top teams or playing away, we should use the 442?
