KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#328752 06/05/13 04:19 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 140
S
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
S Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 140
A lawyer involved in the landmark Bosman ruling 18 years ago lodged a European Commission complaint on Monday against UEFA rules aimed at limiting the spending of top clubs.

European football's ruling body UEFA will bring in Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations next season to ensure clubs move towards break-even or face exclusion from continental competition.

Jean-Louis Dupont, representing Belgian player agent Daniel Striani, is challenging the break-even rule and believes it restricts competition.

Restrictive regulations

"In effect a club owner is prohibited from overspending even if such overspending aims at growing the club," Dupont said in a statement.

He added the rule restricts investment, ensures the continued dominance of the leading clubs, reduces transfer activity and is likely to lead to a cut in player wages and the income of agents.

UEFA suspended Turkish team Besiktas from European competition a year ago over unpaid bills and announced in December the same punishment for Spanish side Malaga.

The European Commission confirmed it had received a complaint but declined to comment further.

UEFA said the Commission, the European Parliament, clubs and leagues had all supported its FFP initiative and that it was designed to guarantee long-term viability of football.

It said it believed FFP was fully in line with EU law and was confident the Commission would reject the complaint.

Dupont said that even if the ban on overspending was justifiable, it would be illegal because UEFA could achieve its aims with a less restrictive measure.

He added UEFA could instead require that any spending beyond projected income be fully guaranteed for the duration of a season.

Dupont was part of the legal team that secured the Bosman ruling at the European Court of Justice in 1995.

The ruling ended national league limits on foreign European Union footballers and allowed players to move to other clubs without a transfer fee at the end of their contracts.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 135
M
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 135
A follow up
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/footb...st-8605315.html

Difficult to challenge because it's technically voluntary but should be interesting anyway.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,554
S
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,554
Said it before, the clubs with money will find a way around

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
i knew this would happen..same lawyer that won the bosman case too...ffp is over..

typical of todays capitalism. can't be capitalist if u restrict the individuals earning power. socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor doesn't work in the entertainment industry.. lawyer about to give plantini a beatdown

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,365
C
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,365
Originally Posted By: EMP
i knew this would happen..same lawyer that won the bosman case too...ffp is over..

typical of todays capitalism. can't be capitalist if u restrict the individuals earning power. socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor doesn't work in the entertainment industry.. lawyer about to give plantini a beatdown


it does not have to be legal. Its a code of conduct for all clubs to follow. for example- I wont let you wear trainers in my bar, this not a lawful thing to do. However it's my bar and I can let in who I want. Same for champs league, follow my rules of compliance or dont play in my competition. Thats why the Prem league are adopting it.
This is not a matter of law but it a rule to gain entry

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
nope these clubs are financial institutions subject to employment laws and discrimination claims. how can a capitalist club bar players because they want no restrictions on how much they can earn - a hallmark of capitalism.

this case will blow ffp out of the water

Last edited by EMP; 07/05/13 03:24 PM.
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
Originally Posted By: EMP
nope these clubs are financial institutions subject to employment laws and discrimination claims. how can a capitalist club bar players because they want no restrictions on how much they can earn - a hallmark of capitalism.

this case will blow ffp out of the water


Are you a lawyer? Judging by the way you write, I would guess that you aren't. They can't issue a discrimination claim from violating the rules of the competition. Like he said, it's their competition, their rules.

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
and u ain't either. but this lawyer will win cause u can't bar people with rules about payments.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 583
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 583
EMP, its THEIR competition, you go by THEIR rules and play against THEIR teams in THEIR competitions, if this lawyer has a problem with it why doesn't he start HIS OWN football association and stop disrupting ours, there's nothing he can do as this isn't anything to do with discrimination or racism its simply a new rule to make it a fairer competition.

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
free market . the whole system of law is set up to protect that. u watch FFP hasn't got a leg to stand on. clubs are corporations . corporations are protected from regulations like ffp. FFP is over

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion