All Stadia spending and Youth spending is exempt from FFP, so that doesn't affect spending on players that is allowed that would add to club debt. There will basically be 2 sets of books, one to the tax man and for business, the other for FFP that disregards all expenditure for youth, training and stadium facilities.
They already stated the objections to Man City's commercial deal. Irrespective of whether they can get away with it, be proud that the club chooses not to cheat the rules in order to win. The feeling of winning will be all the sweeter if/when it happens. If Dubai International or whatever their name was had taken over, we'd likely be in a great position. As it stands, just accept that there is no quick fix, and analyse and discuss the problem in front of the club...
This is what I said regarding the stadium. A Sugar Daddy can build a huge stadium quickly for us, FFP or not,instead of flip flapping on the issue. We'll see if City can get away with their commercial deal. What I said was an answer to your statement about the end of Sugar Daddies in football, but now your are talking about pride and sweetness. I wonder if Chelsea or City fans are not proud to have won the EPL because they feel they bought it. On the other hand, would you be very proud to see the owners taking huge funds from the club like the Gladzers are doing both in dividends and interests?
There is a quick fix but not with FSG, let's hope there is at least a fix some day, rather sooner than very later. The longer it takes the harder it would be.
