KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Liverpool transfers to be decided by comitee

Man united unoficially 'recommended' Charlie Adam

So if br gets sacked in the future.. So does the committee??

Of course, what else? LFC management is really thinking out of the box these days, either they are geniuses or a complete joke.

"Desperate" is the word you're looking for.

It seems like they're trying everything they can to find a way to the top without having to fork out - trying to revolutionise the way a football club should be run. All these ideas, philosophies and hairbrained schemes are beginning to get on my titts.

Im not sure about this committee lark, but wasn't our famous boot room a bit of a committee with the gaffer having the final say....so long as buck has the final say because its his head on the block

that's true, I haven't seen the source but it smacks of a club(company) trying to be perceived as active and dynamic. I'd prefer silence to be honest.
It also stinks of 'absentee boss', putting people in charge and then getting out of the country, those left behind have to justify their position and end up causing more damage than good. I didn't want more American owners and the choice surprised me.
They are not so bad FSG but they are not any good either.

Don't think they want to create any kind of perception, they have really embarked in something they don't understand and are learning it the hard way, nothing they expected initially when they got the club for a steal, this is why Hicks and Gilette were crying over the roof. Hopefully thet find out that they really need to invest else the club will just lose it's value or may be they decide to sell at a small profit to somebody who has the money to spend.

When will there be an acceptance that sugar-daddy football is going to be over? There is no chance of huge team-investment by any owner or else you will be barred from Europe... And to be frank, I am thoroughly happy for it. It stops this cash driven mayhem and will prove on a more level playing field, which teams successfully pick out players that will contribute to their team. More strategy based dealings, and likely higher turnover of players for mid-table value...

You might be correct that FFP will do that but I am nowhere sure. In any case, a Sugar Daddy would have been able to gift LFC a 100, 000 capacity stadium whithout any effect regarding penalties in respect of FFP. Also, did you check the commercial revenues of City last year, they are second only to United, its just a disguised way of their Sugar Daddy to inject money which is all accepted under FFP. Let's see how Chelsea and City spend in summer, that would show what FFP really means.

All Stadia spending and Youth spending is exempt from FFP, so that doesn't affect spending on players that is allowed that would add to club debt. There will basically be 2 sets of books, one to the tax man and for business, the other for FFP that disregards all expenditure for youth, training and stadium facilities.

They already stated the objections to Man City's commercial deal. Irrespective of whether they can get away with it, be proud that the club chooses not to cheat the rules in order to win. The feeling of winning will be all the sweeter if/when it happens. If Dubai International or whatever their name was had taken over, we'd likely be in a great position. As it stands, just accept that there is no quick fix, and analyse and discuss the problem in front of the club...