Didn't Fergie take 5 years, but yeah suppose he's not good enough at all. I agree and disagree at the same time with Carheex, he has a good point in what he's saying but he's not backing it up with great points at al
So you think that keeping someone for 5 years will turn them into the the greatest manager that the game has ever seen? We should have kept Hodgson then...
Ferguson is the exception, not the rule.
Maybe we shoud have kept carroll for 5 years just to give him a chance to surpass Messi's goals scoring achievements?