KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum question ok who replaces rodgers ???

what a pathetic thread

no bar but the usual suspects do

would moyes cross the road?

perfect he'd be,,knows players and can manage men,doesn't need a bunch of kids to talk brent too

Moyes wasn't that good during his first few seasons. Rodgers needs time. We need to see where he ends up at the end of the season. If he gets us higher than 8th, then it's progress.

The club at this stage needs stability and an experienced manager. The owners are in experiment mode and yet claim they want to win. I hope BR does well, but I have my doubts now.
A manager the players look upto and fear is what we need now. Our players have been professing the wrong attitude offlate, and BR is finding it difficult to do something about it.
Experienced, successful name would help.

Also all this talk about Rome not being built in a day, I think by the time our Rome is built and ready united will be 50 odd titles down, at this rate.

You need to give managers 2 years before true judgement can be made. I think a lot of people need to wind their necks in and relax.

should we have gone for Laudrup ? Doing well at Swansea in fact better then BR and they sold there supposed bet players Sinclair and Allen

Don't think it's pathetic at all, in fact it both pro and against BR. The way I see it is that BR should only be replaced if we can get a manager with good credentials, somebody who has won trophies, else no need to sack him. Though I thought that sacking KD was probably premature, the real mistake was to replace him by BR. Would have loved it if the replacement was JoseM, Klopp and the likes, even Deschamps and Blanc would have been better choices according to me. There was no point in replacing KD by BR. We shouldn't do the same mistake again, ie go for managers who have never won anything in their career. Though such a decision might pay off, the risk of getting backwards again is too big.

I totally agree. It's not question of sack BR and then think what next? The alternative plan should be part of the decision.

I know many on here are vehemently against Kenny as a manger, but having been appointed he should only have been sacked if the alternative was much better. At the moment, it's not looking that way at all.

Unless of course we go with the theory that BR is a young manager and it was always part of a 3-5 year plan that he would be given a couple of seasons to settle into the job. i.e. learn a few things and maybe show now obvious progress for a season or two with a view to reaping the rewards from season 3 onwards. If this is the case, then the owners/management should've done a better job in managing fans expectations.