KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
Originally Posted By: vish mauritius
Originally Posted By: Annefield58
if we don't compete on all fronts including transfer cost and wages we don't compete on the pitch, theres no realistic option but to secure players of quality to match the big boys and we wont do it by cutting wages and transfer costs, that's a self defeating policy.
FSG's actions to date all have the hallmark of the corporate raider about them, ie getting the club into shape for a sell off, if they were serious about building the club back to the top they'd be going all out for that 4th place and quite clearly they're not going all out for that. They can hardly be foolish enough to think they can compete with Man U, City, Chelsea, and Arsenal bu buying mid to low table quality players and young 'potentials' that policy is already shown to be a failure.


But then they wont get a high price when they sell. A club who can compete for Champions League is always going to be worth more than a bottom half team. I would say with such a policy they would be planning to stay much longer and manage in a sustainable manner. They are hoping that ffp rules will force other teams to cut their expenditure and that our youngsters will be able to get us to compete for honours in a a few years. Once that happens, then the value of the club will increase and they would make their huge margin selling. Looks good on paper, but, will it work? I am not convinced


Then they are more naive then I thought.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Do you think they know anything in football, no soccer?

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
I'm sure they hired out Bend It Like Beckham before taking over the club.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: vish mauritius
Originally Posted By: Annefield58
if we don't compete on all fronts including transfer cost and wages we don't compete on the pitch, theres no realistic option but to secure players of quality to match the big boys and we wont do it by cutting wages and transfer costs, that's a self defeating policy.
FSG's actions to date all have the hallmark of the corporate raider about them, ie getting the club into shape for a sell off, if they were serious about building the club back to the top they'd be going all out for that 4th place and quite clearly they're not going all out for that. They can hardly be foolish enough to think they can compete with Man U, City, Chelsea, and Arsenal bu buying mid to low table quality players and young 'potentials' that policy is already shown to be a failure.


But then they wont get a high price when they sell. A club who can compete for Champions League is always going to be worth more than a bottom half team. I would say with such a policy they would be planning to stay much longer and manage in a sustainable manner. They are hoping that ffp rules will force other teams to cut their expenditure and that our youngsters will be able to get us to compete for honours in a a few years. Once that happens, then the value of the club will increase and they would make their huge margin selling. Looks good on paper, but, will it work? I am not convinced

With a slimmed down club,carrying no debt, with great marketing and sponsorship potential LFC would be very marketable. I don't think FSG are foolish enough to put much store by ffp, in any case in a few years our best players will be gone and based on the percentage of 'potentials' who come good our competitive ability will have dwindled. That's true of potentials generally but particularly those bought on a shoestring. Such a policy would be very foolish and I don't think they are quite that foolish. I do believe it's a short term corporate raiding exercise,based on their behaviour to date.

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
J
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
J Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
That 65k figure rumoured for Sneijder is after tax...

Our Offer was 120k per week, top limit for tax is 50% but going down to 45% in April...

The reason we didnt get him was he wanted parity with gerrard on 140k per week.

Anyway that issue aside. I think our ceiling is around 100k per week prior to tax. The only players who earn more than this is Johnson and Gerrard I think.

They have reduced the wage bill from 72% to about 50% now this year alone.

Once Carroll 90k is gone I think we might even be under that 50% mark considering we no longer have Sahin and Cole on huge wages...

They are changing the wages from 120k standard to around 80k plus performance bonus's.

Where is the money going though? Saved about £32 million in wages, Increased Sponsorship deals, Increase in TV money...

Still no stadium... frown

Somethings not right.


Last edited by JayGB1982; 28/01/13 07:35 PM.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Maybe they're financially making room for the ravemped Anfield Stadium?

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 431
B
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
B Offline
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 431
They are trying reduce costs to make us more appealling to potential buyers.

They bought us on the cheap and will be able to make a tidy profit in the not too distant future.

I dont blame them though as they are an investment company who saw a great opportunity and took it.

The fault lies with Moores and Parry who made a huge error of judgement in the first instance.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
look at it however you want. if you want to see how where going to end up just have a look where villa was 5 years, 4 years, 3 years since and look at them now! thats what we should be scared of, its a real possibility we are already heading that way. in fact 3 years since villa were in better shape than we are now.

dont second guess what FSG will do in the future, what they have planned what they're doing with the assets or pay structure. look at whats happened and where we are. can you believe that spurs have passed us so easily. are they really a better and bigger club than us. at the minute I still dont think they are but I dont know how long I can keep kidding myself


dont be an hater, take the banter!
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
look at it however you want. if you want to see how where going to end up just have a look where villa was 5 years, 4 years, 3 years since and look at them now! thats what we should be scared of, its a real possibility we are already heading that way. in fact 3 years since villa were in better shape than we are now.

dont second guess what FSG will do in the future, what they have planned what they're doing with the assets or pay structure. look at whats happened and where we are. can you believe that spurs have passed us so easily. are they really a better and bigger club than us. at the minute I still dont think they are but I dont know how long I can keep kidding myself


dont be an hater, take the banter!
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
sorry for double post


dont be an hater, take the banter!
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion