KopTalk

Quick Links: Liverpool FC Forum | ShoutBox | Podcast | KopTalk.TV | Upgrade to VIP forums

Forums Active Threads
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Positive FSG
#304744 26/01/13 06:22 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
JP1892
Offline
Under 18 Player
JP1892
Under 18 Player
Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
Took a rath of criticism from you lot reacenty foe saying that FSG do have positive sides in their ownership. Yea they chat some [oops] and they let us down in January but they have delivered with sturridge and now coutinho. That will be 20 million of investment in good fast and skilful forwards. That can only be exiting. The first attacking Brazilian in our history is on the verge of signing and I for one will be exited to see how he fits in to our team.

I just think some of you are a little harsh on FSG. I'm not saying their great or good owners. You can never please everyone. But they are willing to accept they have made mistakes and are actually making investment in descent players at the moment. Not to mention geting rid of overpaid and overrated players.

Don't start going over the top. But I'd say it has been a descent January so far.

Read between my lines.
Re: Positive FSG
JP1892 #304746 26/01/13 06:27 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
Surrey, UK
J
JayGB1982 Offline
Under 23 Player
JayGB1982
Under 23 Player
J Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
Surrey, UK
Doing what they should be doing and the bare minimum at that... Deserved of Praise? Not a chance!
Re: Positive FSG
JP1892 #304747 26/01/13 06:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Not the EU
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Not the EU
You coud argue they have to send some money on the team in order to protect their investment not in order to be generous to us. It's right they are careful and not waste as in the kenny era. But what matters is the big stuff investment in the clubs infrastructure that's been neglected for 30 years. I see no sign of that yet.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Re: Positive FSG
Stanley Park #304748 26/01/13 06:48 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
JP1892
Offline
Under 18 Player
JP1892
Under 18 Player
Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
They just announced the plans for the redeveloping anfeild so when or if that happens it will be good. Especially as i wasn't keen on moving stadium myself.

January is a bad time to buy players and yea we did need players but once they have delivered surely they deserve an acknowledgement instead of just criticising when things don't go our way. I think they are doing things the right way in terms of players at the moment.

Read between my lines.
Re: Positive FSG
JP1892 #304749 26/01/13 06:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,537
KOPTALK
Dunk Offline
KopTalk Editor
Dunk
KopTalk Editor
Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,537
KOPTALK
Originally Posted By: JP1892
Took a rath of criticism from you lot reacenty foe saying that FSG do have positive sides in their ownership. Yea they chat some [oops] and they let us down in January but they have delivered with sturridge and now coutinho. That will be 20 million of investment in good fast and skilful forwards. That can only be exiting. The first attacking Brazilian in our history is on the verge of signing and I for one will be exited to see how he fits in to our team.

I just think some of you are a little harsh on FSG. I'm not saying their great or good owners. You can never please everyone. But they are willing to accept they have made mistakes and are actually making investment in descent players at the moment. Not to mention geting rid of overpaid and overrated players.

Don't start going over the top. But I'd say it has been a descent January so far.


Sorry but how many players have gone out and come in? The squad remains thin. They have a LOT more to do.
Re: Positive FSG
JP1892 #304750 26/01/13 06:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,537
KOPTALK
Dunk Offline
KopTalk Editor
Dunk
KopTalk Editor
Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,537
KOPTALK
Originally Posted By: JP1892
They just announced the plans for the redeveloping anfeild..


Yet the club was sold to them on the understanding they'd build a new stadium.
Re: Positive FSG
Dunk #304753 26/01/13 07:06 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
JP1892
Offline
Under 18 Player
JP1892
Under 18 Player
Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: JP1892
Took a rath of criticism from you lot reacenty foe saying that FSG do have positive sides in their ownership. Yea they chat some [oops] and they let us down in January but they have delivered with sturridge and now coutinho. That will be 20 million of investment in good fast and skilful forwards. That can only be exiting. The first attacking Brazilian in our history is on the verge of signing and I for one will be exited to see how he fits in to our team.

I just think some of you are a little harsh on FSG. I'm not saying their great or good owners. You can never please everyone. But they are willing to accept they have made mistakes and are actually making investment in descent players at the moment. Not to mention geting rid of overpaid and overrated players.

Don't start going over the top. But I'd say it has been a descent January so far.


Sorry but how many players have gone out and come in? The squad remains thin. They have a LOT more to do.


I agree they do. I agree that we are miles behind where we could be if we had heavy investors as owners but that's not reality. They ARE trying to some extent. I'm not defending them and as I said at the top not declaring then great owners but I do think they have good intentions and have made some better choices post kenny dalflish in terms if buying and selling players.

Read between my lines.
Re: Positive FSG
Dunk #304754 26/01/13 07:12 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
JP1892
Offline
Under 18 Player
JP1892
Under 18 Player
Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 806
UK
Originally Posted By: Dunk
Originally Posted By: JP1892
They just announced the plans for the redeveloping anfeild..


Yet the club was sold to them on the understanding they'd build a new stadium.


I always remember them saying they'd not be against a new stadium and or redeveloping anfeild. As i remember they had numerous meetings with the fans and different groups of supporters as to what they'd like. I never wanted a new stadium as long as we could compete with the top teams in redeveloping anfeild. Eg a 65,000 sweater stadium would out do everyone except man utd.

Read between my lines.
Re: Positive FSG
JP1892 #304794 27/01/13 12:31 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Not the EU
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Not the EU
We need a new stadium redevelop anfield is the sticking plaster solution and in any event where is it? It will just be extended out for years. Spending on the team in net terms has been spendthrift.

Sorry cant get excited club and fans are being short changed.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Re: Positive FSG
Stanley Park #304795 27/01/13 12:33 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Not the EU
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Not the EU
Anfield will be 60k max FOR EVER no hope f expansion plus tarted up stadia normally have poor views, They are consigning Liverpool to second class status fr all time.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion
Privacy Policy · Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Support · Forum Help · KopTalk.com
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1