KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Brendan in, how long...??

Seen allot of differing views on here, rafa back, brendan out, give him more time etc etc

Personally, im a fan of giving Brendan more time for now, but would only also have him go if rafa was the guaranteed replacement, this also depending on current performances not improving.

Question then, to all who think BR should be given more time, when and how long, what point do you all get to, when even the staunchest fan on here wants him out?

I give him until Christmas 12 months bar a serious chance of relegation this season.

I've had serious reservations about him since we were first linked. I desperately want him to succeed but from what I have seen so far, both on & off the pitch, I am convinced he is well out of his depth and wouldn't bring us success if he was given an infinite transfer kitty - he just doesn't have what it takes.
He strikes me as a man that can talk-the-talk, and is massively fortunate that the people who interviewed him don't have a clue about football - he has been given the job because he interviewed well and told them what they wanted to hear.

I would love to know how he was considered the best man for the job when the likes of van gaal, benitez, riijkaard, klopp, capello, villa-lobos and many more were all viable candidates. The mind boggles.

Dont think its anything to do with rodders but FSG to be honest.Once we have owners who want to win things we can start looking at better quality managers Klopp etc.Whilst these current leeches are making handsome profits off the club as it stands why would they bother investing?Remember these people are hedge fund experts and financially motivated,they are not sports people im afraid.

He should get a full season , i think a lot of things have conspired against rogers this season, especially the no s triker fiasco. Ithink he talks out of his backside to the media, and if he thinks they will print what he says without taking the pee out of him if liverpool start sliding down the table then he is mistaken.

He hasn't done a lot wrong, nor did kenny (apart from his transfer buys)

ITs true it was either him or martinez and i am so glad we didnt get martinez. Klopp and the rest would have created too many problems with the board over transfer money. I definately would give BR till the end of hte season even if it gets really bad (not relegation bad - but bottom half of table bad near the run in

we simply can keep getting rid of managers, its so detrimental to the team, they should have appointed Van Ghal as DS. what is so unbelievable is why FSG gave the most important position at the club to a completely unproven manager with NO track record, to run the club as he pleases, the fact is he has no experience in running a club like LFC we aint Swansea where the gamble pays of or not it wont make too much difference to them its way too risky we want stability not risk takers.

I want rogers to succeed dont get me wrong, but the documentary showed how stupid these owners are and that they do have the money to make things happen.

You are missingthe point rogers doesnt 'run the club as he pleases', thats why they picked him. Another manager would have walked with no striker!

You'd be content with being in the bottom half would you? Is that because you think it's more or less where we deserve to be, or are you buying into the idea that we need time to adapt because rodgers is changing the way we play football?

Personally, regardless of the fact that rodgers has made 'minor tweaks' to how we play, with the players we have and the money spent in recent years I still think we should be at the business-end of the table pushing for EL qualification. Financially, we're a tier or 2 below the manchesters and londons but I don't see why we aren't the best of the next level down.

He's their 'yes' man, for sure.

RIGHT!!!!!

FSG ARE F***ING us over we need to make a stand and NOW!!!