I am going to say something controversial.
But before I do let’s get one thing out of the way.
The May 2005 final in Istanbul was my greatest ever moment as a football fan nothing else is remotely close. I am proud to be able to say I attended that game and am grateful for once for flight delays and general Turkish airport transfer cocks ups which meant I was not able to have any alcohol before the match which mean’s I watched the game entirely sober. This meant I saw and experienced every second. So no way would I want it to never have happened.
But and I said this at the time I wonder whether that result gave a false perception of our status it hid underlying flaws in our club and prevented actions that had to be taken. It also created an inflated view of Rafa amongst the fans. Now I do accept we also qualified for the 2007 and the semi final in 2008 and regularly qualified for the champions league to be fair to Rafa. And of course the ownership debacle to be fair also made it almost impossible for Rafa.
But I wonder underneath all these events was an apathy in the club and an underlying decline and had we not had that huge shot in the arm in 2005 this might have been recognised and rectified earlier?
Just some thoughts I have wondered over it sometimes.
if we had had no istabul then we probably have never got Hicks and Gillete - no secret that the number of fans taken by Liverpool surprised world sport.
this means the 300+mil we have lost since then would/could still be in the club somewhere, maybe on the field of play.
an interesting thought?