KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum weakest link ?!

Skirtel

a good defender, but with the passing style when he has the ball he isn't aware of his surroundings, mistake at WBA and now again.

Rodgers needs to keep pressure on him at training

What? At West Brom it was clever out of Long he played for the foul Skrtel did what anyone would do there. But yeah today was terrible but it happens he scored our goal so it cancel's it out sadly enough

No, can't agree Eastman. He was our player of the season last year and rightly so. His goal today was great, he, like all the players are adjusting to a new system and thats going to take more then 2 games, its too early to single out players, there was quiet a few mistakes out there today but overall a big leap forward......

Today was a great team performance but if there was a weak link today I'd have to say it was Borini on the right wing. I dont think he done bad, just dont think thats his ideal position. Would have been interesting to see him pushed into Suarez's position, with Suarez played on the left and Sterling played on the right.

Who has not made a mistake ? come on who?

Judge him at the end of the season. If he is doing that ever week then fair enough.

to be fair he was immense last season and was solid today in my opinion baring one momentary lapse of concentration it happens to the best of us everyone makes a mistake or two

No way is skrtel our weakest link, the only weak link is right wing, because borini is noooo waayyy a right winger!!

Am i the only one who thinks Borini actually had a decent game today?

he wasnt as bad as some people say. he should be playing as a striker though

Yeah, he almost scored, and didn't really put a foot wrong. I'm getting a little over how some people support the players, get behind him. He's played 5 competitive games and has a goal and has been in good positions to get his second. Once he gets used to the team and they gets used to him and each other, it will only be a matter of time before they start going in.