Over suarez? But suarez is still here - doesn't make sense - get rid of both them.
Over Carroll - a gamble - didn't pay off - get rid of Carroll - but carroll is still here.
Over the second half of the season ..... they didn't invest in a nnew striker last x mas and the form we finished with last year continues.
Out attacking options are no greater, our midfield with allen is strengthended and our defence, judgin albeit on one performance, is all over the shop.
So why did dalglish get sacked?
Dalglish got the sack (for a number of reasons but if you want the biggest its) because he prosided over the worst transfer period in Premier League history in terms of value for money. I don't give a t*ss about net spend in relation to this argument before anyone who doesn't understand numbers comes at me with that, because net spend isn't the key figure in looking at how much value for money Kenny got.
He spent over 100 million pounds, potentially our only chance to close the gap on our rivals in terms of being able to spend big on players, and he let all of us down by literally wasting it on average players with 'PL experience' for the most part. Suarez was long sorted before he arrived, as Suarez has said himself, Enrique is the only good bit of business he did and that was 6 million out of something like 114 mill (actual figure may vary depending on what you read but its all over 100 mill).
Who was involved in making these decisions (at the top end, can't blame the scouts), Kenny Dalglish and Damien Comolli. Where are they now? Not at the club. Both of them deserved the sack because they wasted possibly the only opportunity we will have to make big big money signings. Thus setting us back years and years unless Rodgers can perform miracles.
Though tbh I don't even know why you're bringing this stuff up.