KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946
P
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
P Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946
the record says he will get injured, but you know cause it's the mancs it will backfire in your face. They will win the league or be there abouts to

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,678
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,678
Good signing. just shows i how far lpool have slipped when it comes to steller names moving clubs

C
craney91
Unregistered
craney91
Unregistered
C
Originally Posted By: CarheeX
I don't see why going to Utd is the ultimate insult?


Neither do I.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
You did at 1.34pm (your previous post!). grin

T
thundyr
Unregistered
thundyr
Unregistered
T
Originally Posted By: LFC2k5
Good signing. just shows i how far lpool have slipped when it comes to steller names moving clubs


Why would we buy someone our rivals aren't interested in keeping?

T
thundyr
Unregistered
thundyr
Unregistered
T
Originally Posted By: CarheeX
You did at 1.34pm (your previous post!). grin


+1 smile

C
craney91
Unregistered
craney91
Unregistered
C
Well I support Man United so why would I?

L
lelle
Unregistered
lelle
Unregistered
L
Originally Posted By: craney91
van Persie.

Year - Minutes played - Goals - Assists

2011/12 - 3331 - 30 - 12
2010/11 - 1770 - 18 - 7
2009/10 - 1252 - 9 - 7
2008/09 - 2199 - 11 - 10
2007/08 - 1073 - 7 - 3
2006/07 - 1456 - 11 - 7




It clearly shows, since van Persie arrived at Arsenal, that last season was by far and away his best season, it was also that last season where he played by far and away the most amount of minutes since being at Arsenal. Playing in nearly every game in an injury free season. Manchester United have paid £24MILLION for a 29 year old in the final year of his contract, for a player who has had good 1 season, maybe 2 if you push it, in 6 seasons of Premier League football. The player is also known to be injury prone, last season he was injury free, but as you get older the likelihood of injury's become even more likely.

IF van Persie replicates his last season for Arsenal in a Man United shirt, then he may go some way to justify the price tag. However he didn't look brilliant in the Euro's either. Plus his output will come at the cost of another player, Wayne Rooney, either/or will be the case here, both won't do it at the same time. Rooney was second fiddle to Ronaldo, until Ronaldo went. When that happened, Rooney scored the goals. van Persie doesn't play with a partner, he plays up front in a front 3.

But if van Persie fails to replicate last season, which the stats say is highly likely, and has just another average season, Arsenal won't just be rubbing their hands (like they are now) they'll be laughing!

£24MILLION for an injury prone grey haired 29 year old in his final year!?! laugh

The disgusting thing is, like Torres to Chelsea, van Persie f*cked of to a main rival, and for that, deserves to get the stick he is gonna get. Going to Man City is one thing, with the likes of Adebayor, Nasri, Kolo Toure and Clichy, going to Man United is the ULTIMATE insult.


+1 RVP is overrated

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 590
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 590
I'm honestly not that bothered by the whole thing. This just smacks of a "Look at me!" signing. Fergie just wants to prove that he can still compete with City and Chelsea in the transfer market. So he's signed a 29-year-old for £25 odd million on the back of one good season. Meanwhile, their midfield is staffed by a couple geriatrics and they have no real defensive midfielder. They have a surplus of fancy wingers and forwards but a defense that is one or two injuries from being completely makeshift. As long as Arsene invests the money reasonably wisely, I don't think Arsenal fans should be that concerned. This one gets a big fat "Meh" from me.


YNWA
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
If RVP was 25 and didn't have such a poor injury record, then his fee would be justifiable. On the other hand, we spent £35m on carroll so who are we to criticise?!

Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion