KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum will Rodgers sign players he hasn't coached before?

Why 'ha' ? If this is true which looks 50/50 at the moment it's not funny we are already a laughing stock.

Just read that myself. I have to say that nothing has bothered me about the short time Rodgers has been here but IF true this will bother me. We can't go from one of the best ball playing defenders in the world, no matter what his injury record, to Ashley Williams! That will worry me about the ambitions of the club. The good thing is, it's in the Mail and they normally talk [oops].

I'm trying to think of a better football playing centre back other than Agger, and its difficult for me, lots of them do the dirty work well, but Agger really plays those balls into holes well, I believe only David Luiz comes close. But even Luiz misses the target sometimes, he sprays it all over the place, and is so dirty he gives away to many fouls.

It makes no sense to me for Rodgers to want to get rid of players who play football the right way, the way he wants to play, HOWEVER on the other hand it could be a master stroke to let some of them go, because lets be honest, Agger has been out with injuries so many times, whos to say next season isn't more of the same? He had perhaps his best season last season, and he still picked up injuries last season. So who's to say we rape a team of 20 odd mill and he is out injured all the time?

It could be a master stroke, but Ashley Williams is not the player who we should be looking at to replace Daniel Agger, and if this does indeed manifest, then its clear to me Rodgers has a budget for that of a mid-table/lower league team. So far I haven't seen that not to be the case as of yet. things could change, I hope.

But Ashley Williams? Surely John Terry is the sort of player we should be looking at?

this is my concern, the fact nesv were looking so far down the food chain as wigan's ''3 bags full sir'' martinez, indicates to me that nesv are averse to spending money till they see progress first.
Still,i think under BR we will play better football so long term nesv will be tempted back into spending.

I think if aggers going its because it s his choice, he was one of the best CBs last year. BR may tell the media he is in control but who knows what players think?

Agger doesn't strike me as somebody who would want to leave, he seems pretty loyal, and that is very rare, but we'll see if money talks, because if it does, Liverpool and Rodgers are about to bomb him out, like they will Carroll, and have done Aquilani.

Agger may feel like he is being forced out and then call the bluff himself. Or it could all just be a load of BS and Agger and Skrtel stay. (Which I'd prefer)

But if we loose one, we must go all out and get a top centre back to replace one, if not both. One of those is a gimmy, its John Terry.

Its funny because this thread is about will BR sign someone he hasn't worked with before. It's a crazy statement, but once again we are now linked with another one.

Agger going anywhere or us actually singing this player.. that is not funny...

i dont think agger is being 'forced out', this is media speculation on the fact that agger has2 years left on his contract and the media is saying agger has to sign a contract when it suits the media

Who would replace him? Gerrard is far easier to replace than agger

Are you serious about John Terry? Why would you want him here? Hardly one for the future at about 31 is he. Might as well play Caragher all the time.

I would sell Agger for 30m. We can get 2 quality centre backs in place of him that are fit and will play 50 or so games a season.

name them?