|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279 |
the F.A. thats good enough for me found guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , and seriously what has bin laden and tony blair got to do with it ? and the hypocricy of it all is everyone wants terry and ferdinand banned but suarez was badly treated , look suarez admitted to the charge and was banned , but like suarez this conspiracy nonsense is laughable . Just because you don't understand or agree with something doesn't make it nonesense and laughable. Have you never heard of miscarriages of justices? Does it not occur to you that the authorities sometimes get it wrong? So anything the FA decides is good enough for you is it? You never disagree with anything the FA does? Suarez did not admit to doing what he was deemed to have done by the panel.
'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly
'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
I would not trust the FA to brew me a cup of tea personally
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
I think Suarez was pressurised by the club into admiting racisim (whatever that means) its clearly getting to him as he believes he was conned. And I don't blame him I would feel the same. do you know to be fact ? because from the report i read he was guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , plus if the club did force well it the club right to as suarez is an employee of the club .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 191
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 191 |
So Terry gets off on an open and shut racist case
Rio calls a fellow coloured played a choc ice and nothing is done.
Yet there are people on here condemning Suarez for looking at those two incidents and feelings harshly treated in his case.
You couldn't make it up.
Grow a pair lads, Suarez is absolutely right, there are 2 sets of rules in place when it comes to racism and the F.A.
so suarez wasnt guilty of using racist language ? As determined by whom? By the FA? Yes. Not by a court. You know that Tony Blair is a war criminal according to some, and Bin Laden is a hero according to others. It's not just about what someone, or some group determines another person is. You have to think for yourself a bit Faz. there was less proof in the Suarez incident than the Terry one, which didn't hold up in a legal court. So in a legal court, I think Suarez would have been cleared. I said we should fight it. Others like to surrender. the F.A. thats good enough for me found guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , and seriously what has bin laden and tony blair got to do with it ? and the hypocricy of it all is everyone wants terry and ferdinand banned but suarez was badly treated , look suarez admitted to the charge and was banned , but like suarez this conspiracy nonsense is laughable . Suarez did not admit to the charge, he admitted to using a term in a context that was not, in his opinion, racist. He was not convicted in a court or even brought to court. It was his word against anothers and to be found guilty is on these terms is questionable. I may be biased but I think he appears honest and when asked about it, seems upfront and hurt. Do you think everyone should be gotten rid of that says thinks in the heat of battle? you use terms like abusive language, are we seriously going to frown on that too? I agree racism has no place in football but to single out one player on questionable terms on something said on the pitch is ridiculous. I think most fans support him, realise what a good player he is and I really dont see the problem with his recent interview
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
what context did he say it then ? because he had just been tackled and he isnt evra's mate so what context was it ?
Last edited by fazakerley red 1; 18/07/12 04:26 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279 |
I think Suarez was pressurised by the club into admiting racisim (whatever that means) its clearly getting to him as he believes he was conned. And I don't blame him I would feel the same. I don't think Suarez did admit to racism as we understand it in this country. He admiitted to using one particular word in a foreign language which to him was not as strong as the similar sounding English word. He admitted use of this word without any club pressure - because he volunteered this information himslef immediately after the game. What the club perhpas pressured him to do was not to pursue an appeal. This seemed to be the righ thing at the time for the club, but could turn out to be an error in the long term.
'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly
'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279 |
do you know to be fact ? because from the report i read he was guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , plus if the club did force well it the club right to as suarez is an employee of the club . which report did you read Faz? The one that the FA published? or are you talking about a newspaper report?
'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly
'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
I think Suarez was pressurised by the club into admiting racisim (whatever that means) its clearly getting to him as he believes he was conned. And I don't blame him I would feel the same. do you know to be fact ? because from the report i read he was guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , plus if the club did force well it the club right to as suarez is an employee of the club . So if your boss pressured you to admit to racism, even though you didn't think you had, that's ok because you're an employee? Now you're just being silly. ok so why did suarez admit it then ? and if LFC are out of order then why hasnt he left this horrible nasty club he plays for ? ,
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
do you know to be fact ? because from the report i read he was guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , plus if the club did force well it the club right to as suarez is an employee of the club . which report did you read Faz? The one that the FA published? or are you talking about a newspaper report? the F.A. report that all could read online did you read it ?.
Last edited by fazakerley red 1; 18/07/12 04:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 191
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 191 |
what context did he say it then ? he used a term that is frequently used in a friendly manner in many latin countries. A term that is not seen as racist and that has been used on social networking sites by many players including Evras teammate Hernandez. From video footage he did not appear aggressive or threatening. He was naive and there is a possibility that he was more sinister. I believe him though although I may be biased but am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. you on the otherhand wont
|
|
|
|
|
