|
|
|
longmoorlane
Unregistered
|
|
longmoorlane
Unregistered
|
Longmoorelane or Caheex??? Longmoorlane, the one who has been banned more than 10 times, and still trolls around. yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn, what a boring man you really are, bet your a barrell of laughs in your house, maybe this feller who keeps getting banned feels like he's not being treated fairly just because he puts posts on a forum people dont agree with, surely people cant get banned for saying things people dont agree with otherwise all those predicting fourth place would be banned, I know me longmoorlane has only posted things relating to football matters and already I am being attacked, I can fully understand how this guy feels by wanting to prove a point if thats the way members on this forum treat people.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
i agree this 4th place stuff is way over the top ,if liverpool get 4th brilliant , but liverpool have finished 7th,6th and 8th in the last 3 seasons and especially last season loads of money was thrown at it and still no 4th place , so instead of demanding 4th placejust see how the season pans out , with for me the number one priority WINNING AT HOME not 4th .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
Longmoorelane or Caheex??? Longmoorlane, the one who has been banned more than 10 times, and still trolls around. yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn, what a boring man you really are, bet your a barrell of laughs in your house, maybe this feller who keeps getting banned feels like he's not being treated fairly just because he puts posts on a forum people dont agree with, surely people cant get banned for saying things people dont agree with otherwise all those predicting fourth place would be banned, I know me longmoorlane has only posted things relating to football matters and already I am being attacked, I can fully understand how this guy feels by wanting to prove a point if thats the way members on this forum treat people. I think your two and only points have been made many times under many guises so in truth I'd say that's you pretty much done.
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Why is it a disgrace if it's paid upfront? Does it even matter? We still have to pay the 35m. Even if we agreed to pay 1m a month for 3 years, and we sell him back this year, we'd still have to pay that 1m a month. We don't suddenly stop. If they paid more upfront it could be because of the new financial rules coming in, or because it was the only way the deal would go through. Anyway, it's obviously a bad deal, but the disgrace was in how much we paid, not how much paid up front. if he goes back to newcastle united the clubs would come to an agreement over payments .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Yes Faz, that's called how much they are willing to pay. The 35m is contracted. If they agree a transfer of 15 for him to go back, we'd only pay 20m, but we'd receive nothing. You do understand that right?
And if we paid 35m up front, and agree to sell him for 15m, we'd also pay 20m. It's the same. do you understand my friend it called making a deal if newcastle want to buy andy carroll's contract then a deal will be made , i believe a similar deal was made for glen johnson with portsmouth over money still not paid for crouch it call making a deal !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564 |
ESPN says we rejected the bid anyway, so there we go.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 138
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 138 |
what i didn't understand about all this, is that the article that i read in the mirror said that brendan and FSG TOLD newcastle that they wanted 17 mill. why would he/they tell NUFC how much they wanted? why say 17 when you have no idea how much they will offer. they could offer millions more. i understand that i am getting this all from ONE newspaper article. i am just saying, if it's true...that's an odd way to do business.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564 |
I don't think it is. They may have made an offer, but I doubt br said he wanted 17 mil.
Last edited by redordead13; 16/07/12 04:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Yes Faz, that's called how much they are willing to pay. The 35m is contracted. If they agree a transfer of 15 for him to go back, we'd only pay 20m, but we'd receive nothing. You do understand that right?
And if we paid 35m up front, and agree to sell him for 15m, we'd also pay 20m. It's the same. do you understand my friend it called making a deal if newcastle want to buy andy carroll's contract then a deal will be made , i believe a similar deal was made for glen johnson with portsmouth over money still not paid for crouch it call making a deal !!! Ok, I can see you don't get it. no mate sadly its you who cant grasp the idea of the clubs coming to an agreement , its called making a deal , i know it tough for you to grasp but that the way business works .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422 |
i rather let carroll leave for free and sign up for sunderland then let him go to newcastle on loan. they can go and [oops] them selfs
|
|
|
|
|
