KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,262
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,262
Yes he can be a very good option

T
thundyr
Unregistered
thundyr
Unregistered
T
Originally Posted By: EastMan
Quote:
How do you know he can't play this role again? The last manager that played him there was Rafa, no other manager has utilised his full potential as a goal scorer. He may be a bit old but I can gurantee you he can get many more goals there and can still play especially if the defensive duties are taken away from him. Some players go to their 40s, Gerrard is still young.


with Rodgers everyone must press, but it is an organized press not run all over till you die like with Hodgson.

and from what i understand from Brendan's tactics he uses 3 CM players, one anchored in front of the defense, and 2 in the very center of the pitch, they rotate attacking the "hole". it's not like with Rafa where one player was committed to this role.

meaning the old role is not even available, but the new Gerrard will need to do his job AND the Alonso job but with organized switching with the other CM player.

this will actually:
1) save his energy
2) help him avoid injury from overworking
3) extend his career as an important player
4) take full advantage of his long experiencing in influencing both attack and defense
5) teams will have a harder time tracking 2 CM players switching attacking roles


Rodgers' system takes discipline and stamina, neither of which an ageing SG has in abundance. I also think it's a fallacy that we *need* an Alonso-type player in the squad. We need people who will be committed to running into space for 90 minutes, and making simple layoffs when in possession. It emphasises team work more than "Stevie Me". Had Dirk Kuyt a better pass and first touch he would be almost ideal for Rodgers' system, for example.

I agree that Gerrard *did* play with much greater discipline for England this Euro's than in recent times for anyone, but that doesn't mean he's suddenly remodelled himself into a powerhouse player. Had he been that magnificent England would have fared far better in midfield than they did against any of their opposition. Yes, a lot of that is down to Hodgson's negative tactics, but had the tactics been different (nay, "better") Gerrard would not have needed such defensive discipline, primarily because Parker would probably have been able to play with greater freedom and therefore have a better tournament himself. So perhaps it's only fair to say that Gerrard adapted to Hodgson's "tactics" better than the rest of the squad simply because he had played under the manager before.

#244589 27/06/12 11:14 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 671
E
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
E Offline
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 671
Quote:
Rodgers' system takes discipline and stamina, neither of which an ageing SG has in abundance.


one of the ideas of possession football is to save energy by holding the ball

and if Gerrard can perform in a negative stale team the he will be even better in a more competent system.

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion