why is it that if a player hasnt won the world cup or the euros or hes not been brilliant for his country hes not regarded as world class these tournaments come round every few years surely they should be judged by the footy they play week in week out for the clubs they play for does this then mean that KD was not world class because he won nothing with scotland or giggs won nothing with wales does this not make them world class because in my eyes they were defo
I dont think winning International honours is the be all and end all myself like, I think if you win a few Champions leagues or domestic league titles you can more than make up for lack of International honours. I just think you need to win the games main honours to be called world class, not just win them but be special in contributing to your team winning them. I think your Zidane, Maradonna, Beckanbaur, Cryuff, Dalglish, Henri e.t.c. all done this, all the world class players throughout history done something special when winning the games big trophies all on more than one occasion. I would say if gerrard played for a big Club who won the games major honours then he would of been world class because he had the ability but no club to provide him with the chance or platform, thats Gerrard's fault, nobody else to blame but him because he was good enough to control his career when most players are not lucky enough, he could of picked anyone to play for but chose to let his heart rule his head and stay with his boyhood teams, Totti done the same with Roma. I would put Gerrard in the could of been world class bracket along with Gascoine,Shearer and Le Tissier all players with tremendos ability but not world class because they never done enough with there carrers.