Is still astonishes me how many people can't open their minds regarding net spend.
Let's do it in point form, so you don't fall behind.
1. If I have a squad worth 1m pounds, how much is my squad worth?
Well done, 1m pounds.
2. If I sell every player I own at their value, how much is my squad worth? That's right, well done again, it's worth f*ck all. But I have 1m pounds in money.
3. If I now buy 1m pounds worth of players what is my squad worth? Yes, that's right, 1m pounds, AND I have no money left.
4. Have I just spent 1m pounds on my squad without increasing its value? YES.
5. Should my squad now be 1m pounds better than it was before I started? NO, IT F*CKING SHOULDN'T! The squad is the same value as it was, so it's the same money, just in different denominations. Is that really too difficult to understand?
Spending 100m and net spend of 30m are completely different concepts - one blindly looks at purchases only without considering the effects on the squad made by people leaving, while the other considers both. Why see with only one eye when you have twice as many?
Put another way, people seem to think letting go of Torres was smart because he was worthless. Except he was far from worthless, considering he was our most prolific striker EVER (in terms of goals per appearance over the players' first few seasons at the club), and as of the time he left Liverpool had more goals AND more assists than any other player on our books. Maybe you have such a short memory that you forgot he was on the shortlist for being inducted into the hall of fame for the period 2001-2010, despite spending only 3 of those years at the club. You don't replace what such a player brings to the club overnight, so ignoring the fact that he left is blatant stupidity. So did Dalglish improve the squad by 100m or by 50m? What about the other players like Meireles, Babel, N'Gog etc?