|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955 |
I will listen, only if your answer contains wisdom
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,239
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,239 |
But we've performed better. Just been unlucky. The part your conveniently ignoring. Under Roy we never looked like winning
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
But we've performed better. Just been unlucky. The part your conveniently ignoring. Under Roy we never looked like winning oh unlucky ok all forgiven
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988 |
But we've performed better. Just been unlucky. The part your conveniently ignoring. Under Roy we never looked like winning I totally agree with this. Kenny has brought some good things to the club and he deserves credit for this. We definitely look like a better team now than under Hodgson but its still not enough. I don't agree with that unlucky part tho.
Last edited by Snakeye; 13/05/12 03:46 PM.
Back to Back World Champions baby!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955 |
don't agree
we were not as bad under roy that you can use that as a example to make a case for kenny.
I will listen, only if your answer contains wisdom
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
But we've performed better. Just been unlucky. The part your conveniently ignoring. Under Roy we never looked like winning I totally agree with this. Kenny has brought some good things to the club and he deserves credit for this. We definitely look like a better team now than under Hodgson but its still not enough. I don't agree with that unlucky part tho. hang on they should be better the club was in turmoil when roy took over players like mascherano and torres wanting off due to the previous regime , and dalglish had no club turmoil and had loads of money to spend so it should be better , but not much better and it should have been loads and loads better .
Last edited by fazakerley red 1; 13/05/12 03:50 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
aldo
Unregistered
|
|
aldo
Unregistered
|
Now it's the end of the season, I will have to say I don't mind if Kenny stays, however I would not show any empathy if he leaves. If he is replaced Martinez is what you would call a safe choice. He knows the league, likes attractive football and is tactically better than Kenny. However the question is from Wigan to Liverpool is a big jump, with unpredictable consequences. It's like schrodingers cat.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988 |
But we've performed better. Just been unlucky. The part your conveniently ignoring. Under Roy we never looked like winning Lets also remember that we were so terrible under Roy, yes we have improved but we were so far down that Kenny's improvement isn't enough at this stage.
Back to Back World Champions baby!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Its impossible to say how bad we were under Roy he was not around long enough. In my view he better than Dalglish. He had less resources, hostile fans and was around at the ownership turmoil. Dalglish has had all the sdvantages but taken us backward.
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Its impossible to say how bad we were under Roy he was not around long enough. In my view he better than Dalglish. He had less resources, hostile fans and was around at the ownership turmoil. Dalglish has had all the sdvantages but taken us backward. 100% correct and i dont know why people cant or as i suspect choose to blank these facts out .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
