chelsea owner had balls
Do FSG?
Some would argue that it takes more balls to stick by a manager than taking the easy choice of sacking a manager.
As we did with Roy Hodgson of course. Or do different performance criteria apply if you were an outstanding player for Liverpool in the 1970's? This is an oft repeated counter to the above and so it will continue to be so as it has a very strong element of truth in it. Dalglish was given the job as a PR exercise to get FSG onside with the fans and he is being given several miles more rope because of who and what he is. To the determent of the club. This sillyness has to stop and Liverpool FC and FSG need to get their act together and fast or this club will be out of sight of the top 4 for good.
I was just playing devil's advocate. Also, I'm not necessarily defending Kenny. I've made my stance on Kenny clear for some time now. Just because I refuse to act like a child or a spoiled fan about it, doesn't mean I'm "pro-Kenny", "blind" or whatever else you may care to pigeon-hole me with.
Bear that in mind while I make the following simple point. This season under Kenny in the league has NOT worked out. Our results have been worse than I can ever remember. Football-wise, this is definitely not the worst Liverpool team I've ever seen. We played sh*t football under Hodgson, and it NEVER looked like it was even close to being remotely possible that it could or would work out. I'm frustrated watching the current team because so many things are going right for them on the pitch, but they're constantly falling short on on the finishing side - and woefully. That's the main difference between Kenny and Roy, for me - NOT that one's a club legend and one isn't. Any attempt (and there have been a LOT of them) to use the Roy-Kenny comparison is a cheap and feeble argument, imo.
