|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128 |
Car i was asking you earlier on another thread today, were you happy we won today?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 286
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 286 |
Would you consider selling Suarez for 35m and reinvesting it all into 2-3 other players?
YNWA
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955 |
I will listen, only if your answer contains wisdom
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
It looks like deakin got banned. Simply unbelievable. A certain somebody who has had more usernames on this forum than I've had hot dinners has suddenly developed a 'sensitive' streak. And when I say 'sensitive', I of course mean 'devious', and has become very fond of the notify button it would seem. Everyone's being pulled up for little or nothing lately, yet somebody who has been BANNED from this forum time and time again is free to continue posting whilst others who have witnessed his multiple accounts get banned for saying boo to him. I'm sorry if I "don't have proof" that it's the same person, but it's a fact that it is. EVERYBODY with 2 eyes and half a brain knows it.
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?'
'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955 |
ok cheers for the info 
I will listen, only if your answer contains wisdom
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 759
Under 18 Player
|
|
Under 18 Player
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 759 |
It looks like deakin got banned. Simply unbelievable. A certain somebody who has had more usernames on this forum than I've had hot dinners has suddenly developed a 'sensitive' streak. And when I say 'sensitive', I of course mean 'devious', and has become very fond of the notify button it would seem. Everyone's being pulled up for little or nothing lately, yet somebody who has been BANNED from this forum time and time again is free to continue posting whilst others who have witnessed his multiple accounts get banned for saying boo to him. I'm sorry if I "don't have proof" that it's the same person, but it's a fact that it is. EVERYBODY with 2 eyes and half a brain knows it. If you read Dunks message it's clear for us all, we abide by the rules or we will get banned, we need to all tow the line, if we dont agree with one anothers posts then no problem just disagree and state your case as thats what a forum is for, just dont get personal or abusive and it's happy days.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
It looks like deakin got banned. Simply unbelievable. A certain somebody who has had more usernames on this forum than I've had hot dinners has suddenly developed a 'sensitive' streak. And when I say 'sensitive', I of course mean 'devious', and has become very fond of the notify button it would seem. Everyone's being pulled up for little or nothing lately, yet somebody who has been BANNED from this forum time and time again is free to continue posting whilst others who have witnessed his multiple accounts get banned for saying boo to him. I'm sorry if I "don't have proof" that it's the same person, but it's a fact that it is. EVERYBODY with 2 eyes and half a brain knows it. If you read Dunks message it's clear for us all, we abide by the rules or we will get banned, we need to all tow the line, if we dont agree with one anothers posts then no problem just disagree and state your case as thats what a forum is for, just dont get personal or abusive and it's happy days. Yeah, there's nothing wrong with that philosophy. I think what constitutes "abuse" is being taken a bit to far though. It's gotten to the stage where nobody can say anything anymore. What he said could have been put better, but the message he was actually putting forward was exactly correct and fair.
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?'
'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 759
Under 18 Player
|
|
Under 18 Player
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 759 |
It looks like deakin got banned. Simply unbelievable. A certain somebody who has had more usernames on this forum than I've had hot dinners has suddenly developed a 'sensitive' streak. And when I say 'sensitive', I of course mean 'devious', and has become very fond of the notify button it would seem. Everyone's being pulled up for little or nothing lately, yet somebody who has been BANNED from this forum time and time again is free to continue posting whilst others who have witnessed his multiple accounts get banned for saying boo to him. I'm sorry if I "don't have proof" that it's the same person, but it's a fact that it is. EVERYBODY with 2 eyes and half a brain knows it. If you read Dunks message it's clear for us all, we abide by the rules or we will get banned, we need to all tow the line, if we dont agree with one anothers posts then no problem just disagree and state your case as thats what a forum is for, just dont get personal or abusive and it's happy days. Yeah, there's nothing wrong with that philosophy. I think what constitutes "abuse" is being taken a bit to far though. It's gotten to the stage where nobody can say anything anymore. What he said could have been put better, but the message he was actually putting forward was exactly correct and fair. well it all got out of hand which forced Dunk to take a zero tolerance attitude, some people go to far and wont let things drop. lets hope this puts an end to it all and we can all move on and when he does get back in he will tow the line like the rest of us now do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
It looks like deakin got banned. Simply unbelievable. A certain somebody who has had more usernames on this forum than I've had hot dinners has suddenly developed a 'sensitive' streak. And when I say 'sensitive', I of course mean 'devious', and has become very fond of the notify button it would seem. Everyone's being pulled up for little or nothing lately, yet somebody who has been BANNED from this forum time and time again is free to continue posting whilst others who have witnessed his multiple accounts get banned for saying boo to him. I'm sorry if I "don't have proof" that it's the same person, but it's a fact that it is. EVERYBODY with 2 eyes and half a brain knows it. If you read Dunks message it's clear for us all, we abide by the rules or we will get banned, we need to all tow the line, if we dont agree with one anothers posts then no problem just disagree and state your case as thats what a forum is for, just dont get personal or abusive and it's happy days. Yeah, there's nothing wrong with that philosophy. I think what constitutes "abuse" is being taken a bit to far though. It's gotten to the stage where nobody can say anything anymore. What he said could have been put better, but the message he was actually putting forward was exactly correct and fair. well it all got out of hand which forced Dunk to take a zero tolerance attitude, some people go to far and wont let things drop. lets hope this puts an end to it all and we can all move on and when he does get back in he will tow the line like the rest of us now do. Yes and more than anything let's hope the constant baiting can stop, but I'm not holding my breath on that one because despite what the sticky thread says, apparently constant baiting isn't a bannable offence.
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?'
'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 759
Under 18 Player
|
|
Under 18 Player
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 759 |
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with that philosophy. I think what constitutes "abuse" is being taken a bit to far though. It's gotten to the stage where nobody can say anything anymore. What he said could have been put better, but the message he was actually putting forward was exactly correct and fair. [/quote]well it all got out of hand which forced Dunk to take a zero tolerance attitude, some people go to far and wont let things drop. lets hope this puts an end to it all and we can all move on and when he does get back in he will tow the line like the rest of us now do. [/quote]
Yes and more than anything let's hope the constant baiting can stop, but I'm not holding my breath on that one because despite what the sticky thread says, apparently constant baiting isn't a bannable offence. [/quote]
Its always going be difficult when people have differences of opinion, you just have to be respectful when putting your points across and not get personal or abusive even if you dont like or agree with what a person says.
|
|
|
|
|
