|
jcred2010
Unregistered
|
jcred2010
Unregistered
|
Reina, Johnson, Carra, Agger, Enrique; Bellamy, Hendo, Shelvey, Downing; Gerrard, Suarez.
?
Don't get it.
What don't you get, mate? I'd say it's more of a 4-3-2-1 with Bellamy and Downing supporting Suarez from wide. Most likely Downing on the right. This isn't a problem since Carroll isn't playing, so there's not much point in whipping crosses in to Suarez anyway. So what your thnking this? Reina, Johnson, Carra, Agger, Enrique; Gerrard, Hendo, Shelvey, Bellamy, Downing; Suarez
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
1st Team Squad
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046 |
You dont kno kenny
Could put suarez in goal to suprise the oposition
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 15,010
1st Team Regular
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 15,010 |
played well between the sticks in the world cup.
Luis Garcia, He drinks sangria He came from Barca, to bring us Joy He's five foot seven, he's football heaven please don't take my Luis away.
"...AND 32 MILLION POUNDS WORTH OF GOALKEEPER CAN'T DO A THING ABOUT IT"
|
|
|
|
jcred2010
Unregistered
|
jcred2010
Unregistered
|
played well between the sticks in the world cup.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
OP
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
axed dropped left out its the csame and he hasnt been the worst player in the last few weeks There's no way he was "dropped" or "axed". If he was, he'd be on the bench, not out of the squad altogether. There are only 4 possibly explanations for me. 1. Rested 2. Has picked up a knock 3. Has had a falling out with someone 4. Personal circumstances ok mate keep the excuses coming mate !!!!! Excuses? Sorry, what?
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' 'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
OP
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
Reina, Johnson, Carra, Agger, Enrique; Bellamy, Hendo, Shelvey, Downing; Gerrard, Suarez.
?
Don't get it.
What don't you get, mate? I'd say it's more of a 4-3-2-1 with Bellamy and Downing supporting Suarez from wide. Most likely Downing on the right. This isn't a problem since Carroll isn't playing, so there's not much point in whipping crosses in to Suarez anyway. So what your thnking this? Reina, Johnson, Carra, Agger, Enrique; Gerrard, Hendo, Shelvey, Bellamy, Downing; Suarez That's what I reckon yeah. With Downing on the right and Bellamy on the left.
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' 'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Excuses? Sorry, what?[/quote] the list you put up come on mate he has been dropped like so many times this season when he has actually been playing well
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
OP
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
the list you put up come on mate he has been dropped like so many times this season when he has actually been playing well
How the f*ck do you know?! When he's been dropped this season, it's been to the bench, not out of the squad altogether.
Last edited by BarLennon; 28/04/12 09:11 PM.
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' 'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
the list you put up come on mate he has been dropped like so many times this season when he has actually been playing well
How the f*ck do you know?! When he's been dropped this season, it's been to the bench, not out of the squad altogether. ah well agree to disagree because you must know more .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552
1st Team Squad
|
OP
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,552 |
the list you put up come on mate he has been dropped like so many times this season when he has actually been playing well
How the f*ck do you know?! When he's been dropped this season, it's been to the bench, not out of the squad altogether. ah well agree to disagree because you must know more . I don't know more. I haven't claimed to know more. YOU are the one who claims to know that he's been "axed". You don't know, of course. It's becoming a trend on this forum that a user will spout some nonsensical sh*te, get challenged by a common sense rebuttal, and respond with "agree to disagree" rather than actually backing up their argument with an actual explanation.
*RODGERS *SKRTEL *JONJO
'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' 'If there is hope, it lies in the proles'
|
|
|
|
|