KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum PLEASE GO NOW DALGLISH !!!! TONIGHT !!!!

Im down. Have read many posts and I have to say this post is the only position I agree with 100%. seperate point. did you notice the body language on Bellemy, Suarez, Enrique. as soon as the 1st goal went in, worrying times . TBO the only player i can confidently say will never be good enough for us is Henderson. But not Carrols finest moment with that dive especially after he showed great skill and committment, ahhh!!. Lets not panic with the others. Get a few more in and we have the basis. Although Kuyt is sending my blood pressure through the roof.

if he wasnt kenny dalglish he would have gone by now , and no way is this worse than under roy hodgson over 100 million spent and its a worse squad , roy had a club in turmoil , players wanting to leave , dalglish has been given everything possibly to succeed club steady and even no chance of administration carte blanche to buy and do what he likes , he brings in his own back room staff all in place and its well worse than hodgson's reign , yes fantastic carling cup but winning cups does not make a team good , the league is the yard stick and from sunderland day one it has been a disgrace .

Well i think because I expect so much more from him. but he has gone backwards. But F..k who hasnt. That was unnaceptable today. We are set up as a club to play for the big prizes. We are not arrogant when we look to compete for everything. I see us on a par, AS A CLUB, with the obvious candidates in this country and europe. whats the point in OUR club if we reduce that aim. Dont care what anyone says, thats it, simple. We are miles away at the mo obviously and it bleeding hard to know WTF to do really. But I am convinced totally that we will be back. Lets start with the Bitters.

what a drama queen! your make up is gonna run if you keep crying like this.

worst in 35yrs, my backside. Houllier, Souness and Hodgson all had worst teams.

Also whats all this 100mil lark? we have spent 40mil. If you spend 300mil on players but sell 600mil is it still a 300mil spend? NO stop being a big girl and get behind the team

No way - this is the worst Liverpool I can remember and I have watched them at Anfield from the late 1960's. If this carries on we will be in the bottom half of the table next season. Don't think it can't happen to a club the size of Liverpool because it can.

SOS Rafa

He is a tactical genius and with the financial backing he would receive from FSG we would be back on track much faster than where we are headed now. FSG needs to act before summer transfer window at least. This is one of the MOST important transfer windows in recent history for our club

These "net spend" arguments are so tedious, but I feel the need to respond here.

If you buy a new car for £10,000 and later sell your house for £100,000, you don't say that you haven't spent any money; you don't say that you have a +£90,000 net spend on cars this year. Your car and your house are completely separate investments.

If your job pays £40,000 annually and you spend £500 on beer, you don't say that you have a +£39,500 net spend on beer this year.

It is the same with football players. You don't say "We made a £15 million profit on Andy Carroll because we sold Fernando Torres." Carroll and Torres are entirely separate "investments." We made a £25 million profit on Torres, some of which was spent on Carroll. The other £10 million did NOT come from the sale of Babel. We actually took a small loss (of about £4 million) on Babel. We will not realize any profit on Carroll unless we sell him for £35,000,000.01. Which will never happen, because he is awful.

I'm sorry for being so pedantic, but I wouldn't have to be if people were able to understand these simple concepts.

Hold your horses boy!

If you manage to sell players for 600 mil, then it's a waste to buy shíte for 300 mil. Just because you still have 300 mil on your account I'd say you have just wasted 300 mil!

Aargh!

You just beat me to it!

But I like your post anyway, mate!

No-one's saying we made a profit on Carrol because we sold Torres, that's a silly comparison. The point is people keep saying we shouldn't be in this position after spending £113m etc... but when discussing the amount spent on a football team, you consider players sold because it takes away from the team. The team has had £40m+ of investement. It doesn't matter which way you say it, the team has had £40m+ added to it.

Otherwise, instead of saying Kenny's spent £113m and is doing crap, you might say, Kenny's doing OK (ish), despite selling £70m worth of players! (or whatever the actual figures are).