the way i see it..the reason we sold aquilani was
1.charlie adam(one of the best mid fielders last season)
2.henderson(one of the best young mid fielders)
3.gerrard
4.meireles(one of our best player last season)
5.lucas
6.spearing
after having all these options why would some one keep quilani who is/was famouse forbeing injury prone...and very light weight.
1. Nowhere near as talented as Aquilani
2. Has done nothing this season to justify his price tag, Shelvey is still better
3. No brainer but has figured less than the "injury prone" Aquilani LOL.
4. SOLD because the club didnt give him his promised increase (he was one of lowest paid players at the club)
5. happy with that
6. too funny
He's famous for being injury prone is he? Who says? He's not famous at all for that, he was signed while injured and people latch on because they read nonsense on the internet spouted by others and take it as gospel. I've watched him play during his loans while at Liverpool and he looked fine on the pitch, I didn't see no stretchers, pots, bandages or crutches when he was delivering lovely balls AND why is he lightweight? I've never seen him laid flat out following a bit of wind
