KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum The decision to bin Aquilani made me question new set-up

fair enough but he had and has a history of injury cost a lot of money , on big wages and contract and never did anything , and i think the italian league suits him

LOL. Nah the poster's cool, the reply was just a bit ghey.

yes mate, love it.

Which is what football is all about

But Gerrard can also be classed as "injury prone"...and he hasn't played the amount of games we "expect" and Lucas is out for the season.

So as long as Aquilani stays un-injured, of course he's going to play more games for Milan.

I agree, he should have been kept, he was a better option than Adam, and a better link between Midfield and Attack than anything we've got other than Gerrard. He impressed in pre-season and WE DID USE HIM, it wasn't like he was sat out doing nothing, Kenny had a good look at him and even admitted he looked good...

What sort of wage was he collecting?

Like Andy Carroll then lol.

sure is !!!!

maybe !!!

None of that makes sense to the point I was making. People bang on that Aquilani is injury prone, never plays, yada yada yada and it's not true. People use it against him when trying to prove a point when someone praises him, yet the reality is they're just on the bandwagon.

Gerrard may be injury prone to some but he is several years older. If someone said he never plays I'd say the same thing. People talk nonsense and get away with it.

the way i see it..the reason we sold aquilani was
1.charlie adam(one of the best mid fielders last season)
2.henderson(one of the best young mid fielders)
3.gerrard
4.meireles(one of our best player last season)
5.lucas
6.spearing

after having all these options why would some one keep aquilani who is/was famous for being injury prone...and very light weight.

Well, I actually liked Aquilani (when he played for Liverpool). Had a decent partnership with Lucas, of all people (at the time). Funny how things work out, eh?