KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
1
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
1 Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
Originally Posted By: TheMightyLFC
Originally Posted By: 12th man speaker
Originally Posted By: TheMightyLFC
Originally Posted By: van Gogh
Yeah, that is a problem in itself. Changing manager doesn't mean you have guaranteed success. Could be just more time lost as well!


exactly.... and how long do you give the next guy before you sack him? As soon as he gets one mediocre run of results... or a few of his first signings don't produce the goods straight away, do you start wishing the team to lose so you can bring in your new preferred candidate?
Unfortunately thats football in todays world, you need results straight away, if a Manager does'nt produce ship him out and another in straight away until you get the right one, this is the way big business works.


that's we're we fundamentally disagree i guess. That's not what I want to see. I don't believe in the philosophy of instant success at all cost.

I'd rather see success achieved as a result of hard work and qualitative effort over a period of time. And I hope there's room for romance and sentiment in the game... whereby we achieve success with a style and personnel that we're happy to be associated with the club.

Look at Chelsea... chopped managers quite a few times recently, loadsa money... but where are they? Man City with all their money and managers are still only 50:50 to win the league this year.
O.K. lets look it at this way, you are boss of a big company which needs to keep up with it's competitors, you need someone to run it for you, you bring someone in, you give him an obscene amount of money in wages, you give him full control to make whatever changes he desires to make your company successful, you let him choose his own staff, give him loads of money to spend, provide him with the best facilities and tools for his workforce, when they travel it's first class and best hotels, best training and conditions and basicaly every concievable thing provided for him to be suceesful, so what do you do if the person you appointed does'nt produce and in fact starts to cost your Company money, do you keep him because you dont want to be seen to get shut of under performing managers or do you make a change and try to bring someone in who is up to the Job, I know which I would do.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
12, now you're talking sense!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Originally Posted By: 12th man speaker
]O.K. lets look it at this way, you are boss of a big company which needs to keep up with it's competitors, you need someone to run it for you, you bring someone in, you give him an obscene amount of money in wages, you give him full control to make whatever changes he desires to make your company successful, you let him choose his own staff, give him loads of money to spend, provide him with the best facilities and tools for his workforce, when they travel it's first class and best hotels, best training and conditions and basicaly every concievable thing provided for him to be suceesful, so what do you do if the person you appointed does'nt produce and in fact starts to cost your Company money, do you keep him because you dont want to be seen to get shut of under performing managers or do you make a change and try to bring someone in who is up to the Job, I know which I would do.


You make the change, but your timing has to be right, a suitable alternative has to have been identified and you have to be very confident that the next man will do a better job.

Otherwise you'll have to keep spending a lot of money on the same overheads (compensation for dismissing the existing team; compensation for securing the new team from existing clubs etc)... and each time you do that it'll be dead money.

You do that too often and you lose credibility. The owners get a reputation for not knowing what they're doing and the club's stature takes a battering too. every new guy will ask for time to rebuild... and if you give him one season only the odds are stacked against him.

Furthermore, if you tell the new guy that you want instant success than his decision making will be very short term. He won't identify players that might benefit in the long term and neither will he pay any attention to the academy, reserve team etc.


'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly

'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
Originally Posted By: 12th man speaker
Pepe Guardiola, Klopp, Paul Lambert, Brendan Rogers, Malky Mackay, Andre-Villas Boas, Joachim Loew, Michael Laudrup, or even Guus Poyet, right have given you at least 9 there so go and pick a fault or two with each which is what you are probably going to do anyway.


Some of the names are unrealistic but no I won't pick their faults, I just wanted to know who you had in mind.


Back to Back World Champions baby!
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
1
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
1 Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
Originally Posted By: TheMightyLFC
Originally Posted By: 12th man speaker
]O.K. lets look it at this way, you are boss of a big company which needs to keep up with it's competitors, you need someone to run it for you, you bring someone in, you give him an obscene amount of money in wages, you give him full control to make whatever changes he desires to make your company successful, you let him choose his own staff, give him loads of money to spend, provide him with the best facilities and tools for his workforce, when they travel it's first class and best hotels, best training and conditions and basicaly every concievable thing provided for him to be suceesful, so what do you do if the person you appointed does'nt produce and in fact starts to cost your Company money, do you keep him because you dont want to be seen to get shut of under performing managers or do you make a change and try to bring someone in who is up to the Job, I know which I would do.


You make the change, but your timing has to be right, a suitable alternative has to have been identified and you have to be very confident that the next man will do a better job.

Otherwise you'll have to keep spending a lot of money on the same overheads (compensation for dismissing the existing team; compensation for securing the new team from existing clubs etc)... and each time you do that it'll be dead money.

You do that too often and you lose credibility. The owners get a reputation for not knowing what they're doing and the club's stature takes a battering too. every new guy will ask for time to rebuild... and if you give him one season only the odds are stacked against him.

Furthermore, if you tell the new guy that you want instant success than his decision making will be very short term. He won't identify players that might benefit in the long term and neither will he pay any attention to the academy, reserve team etc.
Well taking that stance I have just mentioned has'nt in the end done United, Barca and Real Madrid any harm has it and they have been doing it for 40 years before they arrived at the right bosses and the right times, no point pereservering with a manager simply not good enough just because your worried about getting a reputation, the best interests of the football club has to come first I am afraid and we are sliding big time into mediocrity.

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
1
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
1 Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
Originally Posted By: TheKopProphet
Originally Posted By: Snakeye
Originally Posted By: 12th man speaker
Pepe Guardiola, Klopp, Paul Lambert, Brendan Rogers, Malky Mackay, Andre-Villas Boas, Joachim Loew, Michael Laudrup, or even Guus Poyet, right have given you at least 9 there so go and pick a fault or two with each which is what you are probably going to do anyway.


Some of the names are unrealistic but no I won't pick their faults, I just wanted to know who you had in mind.


He's just another knee-jerker without a clue I'm afraid. Just throwing names at the problem is of no use at all. Almost all of these managers have little to no experience in the PL - some with little experience anywhere. They have been flavour of the month but there is no guarantee that any of them would fair better than Dalglish. Look at AVB - he was on a few Liverpool fan's lips after Hodgson was sacked but he lasted a mere 9 months in the prem. Guardiola is the big name here but even he would take time to get used to English football, which is a far cry from Barca. No doubt 12th Man/NorthLiverpool would be howling for him to be sacked after 12 games. If he had his way, we'd be just another Chelsea changing managers every year.
If Dalglish had come in won us an F.A.Cup or Carling Cup and gave us a top 6 finish, I would'nt have complained because I think thats all we are as a football club now, the problem I have is that he has spent over 120 million pound on players to give us a top 6 or 7 finish when we could of still achieved that position spending 30 or 40 million on the right players, here lies the conflict.

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 805
K
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
K Offline
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 805
The only way I would sack Kenny is if we hire Robin Van Persie as player/manager. Otherwise lets stick with the program, win the F.A. cup, and find a couple of finishers for next season.


Dirk Kuyt 3 MancScum 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
adam knows how 2 finish chances

Last edited by Armitage; 05/03/12 04:07 AM.
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
1
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
1 Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 76
Originally Posted By: KuytRobbenGod
The only way I would sack Kenny is if we hire Robin Van Persie as player/manager. Otherwise lets stick with the program, win the F.A. cup, and find a couple of finishers for next season.
absolute madness to give Dalglish more money after what he spent the last lot on.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 880
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 880
Originally Posted By: 12th man speaker
Unfortunately thats football in todays world, you need results straight away, if a Manager does'nt produce ship him out and another in straight away until you get the right one, this is the way big business works.


so you are basing this on what model of success? There are not many clubs that have sacked a manager and then found immediate success. Ferguson at your beloved united didn't have immediate success taking them over... so Northliverpool what is your agenda?

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion