KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Curse of the King

Me too

Exactly whats the point of having a forum where no opinions are expoused. Also whats abuse if I said something personal about him or his family fair enough I can see that. But making negative comments on his performance as manager thats fair game and what football discussion is all about either online or in the pub.

Try criticism instead of abuse,lets not have the scenes we had here when rafa and Roy were coming to an end.

well not much chance of that is there. you'd probably just lock the thread...

ceb if you are going to act like a petulant child then just fck off, no one is making you come on here.

as for your other post, see wakka's point.

If Hodgson was'nt hired for footballing reasons then Dalglish certainly was'nt, he was hired because of who he is rather than what he had done, he had been out of the game well over 10 years, imagine Everton bringing back Howard Kendall because thats the same as what we done.

now dalglsih is howard kendall?. maybe you as an everton fan think they are in the same league but i dont.

he put the liverpool back in liverpool fc during a time when we had lost our soul to G and H.

look you are clearly on here as some kind of joke with your blue mates down the pub i.e. "ha ha i wind up lfc fans on an lfc forum and keep getting banned" but im sure the joke has worn thin for them.

That's not totally correct. Yes, the 'who he is' bit was a factor... that part of KK helped to unify the club and provide satability after the H&G deacle in general, the dysfunctional realtionship between Purslow and Rafa, and the unconvincing Roy.

However, KK was initially only a 6 month caretaker appointment. The results he secured at the back end of last season helped him get the job. In addition, he had been involved closely with the club academy under Rafa - so it wasn't wholly a non footballing reasons appointment.

Having said that, he should now be judged like any other manager and should be accountable for the results and the perfromances.

Personally, I would reserve final judgment until the end of the season. Even then, before creating more insatbility, we should think carefully. There are no obvious replacements and I wouldn't want us to become a club which changes manager every other season. Houllier had 6 seasons, Rafa had 6 seasons... idelly I'd like KK to stick around for a few seasons. He's gonna have to up his game big time though.

Or maybe we try a different set up. KK sticks around as a sort of general manager... but we get a top, top footballing coach responsible for gameplan, tactics etc.

sense at last.

How can I be winding people up if I am making valid points, Your right the Club was a mess under Hicks and Gillette, Hodgson was brought in just to oversea the sale of the Club nothing more nothing less and Dalglish should of been brought in to caretaker the Club until the end of the season when Hodgson left, to make him a permanent manager and even give him about 130 million pounds is gross incompetence on the part of John Henry and his consortium. I think my point that it is on the same scale as Everton appointing Howie and Newcastle appointing Keegan is spot on. All these appointments are nothing to do with footballing reasons and everything to do with what these managers did in the past and who they were as in there standings withing the football Clubs, this is why making them managers on that basis is always doomed to failure which is what we are seeing now and why this forum is jammed with unhappy fans.