KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum 8 Game Ban - Suarez

what it does do is upset the player and the club for the season, becuse now he;ll be preoccupied trying to clear his name and trying to get back on the pitch.

its an anti liverpool agenda. ferguson has the fa in his pocket.

It seems no video evidence so it was Suarez that condemned himself,they took so long because the lawyers had to thumb their books to see if it was possible to deem someone a racist before announcing it and of course writing it into their ever growing rule book.

If Suarez accepts the ban now and misses Wigan that means he will be back just in time to face Utd.... I guess that's why they are allowing the appeal so that they can get it to cover that game.

A lot of this is FA vs FIFA. The FA want to show Blatter that they can deal with racism and he cannot. The FA also want to show us that hurting a man's feelings is worth an 8 match ban while breaking a player's leg is only worth 3. It also requires only your word as proof. So if you want to damage a team, just accuse their best players of racial abuse. Easy.

Terry is to be prosecuted. The maximum fine he could get is £2500. Why do we bother?

Think you will find that`s the Maximum fine from the Magistrates court, the FA should be able to impose a fine of their own if proven guilty.

No, he only has to tell someone you said it, even if you didn't.

(Clicky) Luis Suarez & Liverpool Have Limited Appeal Options To The FA & Courts.


Well done Fergie & Gill. You've played a blinder!!

It absolutely stinks, the F.A. stink.

Man United know exactly what they were doing, don't let anybody tell you any different. As soon as Evra whispered that he didn't think Luis Suarez is a racist, the whole accusation should have fallen on its hypocritical arse. The F.A. should then have fined Luis Suarez for using racist language (that could be deemed entirely racist) and made it known that it was wrong. That's why the 8 game ban really bewilders me here, what is that exactly for? I fail to see where that has come from out of the blue. Other than officials at United pushed for it and the F.A. wanted to make a strong example POLITICALLY.

So far, having read and seen the articles in the propaganda ridden media. It is almost like they are running with it, in full support of the F.A.. The same F.A. that they will question a mock when a saga pours out of it....or even easier, when a referee makes a wrong decision on a weekend.

I can't help but notice on every BBC article about the subject, the famous "Suarez hand-ball video at the World Cup" is attached on the same article to watch. What has that got to do with racism? What has that got to do with this situation? That alone tells me that something is up!

However the vast majority of people in this world have been dumbed down and take what they see on the news as the be all and end all, instead of taking it upon themselves and looking at it all from another angle.

I have seen and read 1 ARTICLE since the news broke, that I totally agree with. 1. Because it's not so politically correct and 2. It's the truth.

Tim Vickery's column on the BBC, explained it perfectly.

.....and because he done so and in "that" way the corrupt system doesn't want. I don't expect the article to remain on the BBC sport website for very long (pity I have it all saved on my computer, just in case) I'd worry about the safety of his job also now.

Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16262537.stm

....AND WHAT MORE!?!

The BBC have already edited that article. In fact probably the most valid and true part of it (regardless of it bearing opinion). But as I have the original article all saved, unfortunately for them. I know what was edited, taken out, changed from the original.

Either Vickery was told to change it, or the BBC done it for him anyway. As I said, I feared this when I read the article. It was almost "to true" and something the BBC and F.A. most definitely didn't want getting "out there" it posed and asked the VALID and TRUE questions. So they simply took these questions out.

The first thing I done after reading it thoroughly last night was save it. This is the first time I have ever saved an article on my computer, ever. Because I knew (and something told me) to save it, it was going to be changed/removed. It took the same stance that we are taking.....and in the media eye, this is not tolerated.