Guys, you each have your arguments.....
Pacheco is young and has plenty of potential, and deserves his chance in the 1st team, perhaps as a Sub....
Voronin is a good 3/4 striker to have in the team, given his "pedigree"....just not good enough for Liverpool's 1/2 striker.....
Agree with above? Both have their positives and negatives, but it seems Pacheco has the edge since he is:
1. Young
2. Wanted by top clubs including Barca trying to keep hold of him
3. From what we see, very skillful, creative, attack-minded playmaker, although yet to be proven at the very top level
4. Has potential to be even better given the right coaching
Agreed with the above, trepie and rafarendum?