KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum scott dann v gary cahill

we are heavily linked with both but which one would you rather have ?


gary cahill i feel is more of a compatible player who is a techniqule defender a bit like agger, great reader always calm, great leader at the back line and always does well in the big games, consitent, alot of pace and energetic made a big diffrence for bolton the last few season also is great vision from the back and quite strong.


scott dann, tall strong and throws his body at everything a brave and all in defender and was a liverpool supporter so would understand the club better then cahill, but sometimes whenever i have watched scott dann seems to have a bad habbit ofjust lumping the ball up field, but is also cool under pressure when crosses are consitently coming from left and right always is first to stick hios head on it.






TBH i would rather have gary cahill as i said he is techniquly better then dann andhas great vision for a CB.

but what do you think.

Both please!

If I had to pick one, I'd go for Dann. Him being from Liverpool, being a good defender, and being cheaper. Plus Carra isn't getting any younger, and it would be great to have another Carra. Carra isn't the most technical player, but, because he's Liverpool through-and-through, he makes up for it will passion.

i wouldn't say dann is as liverpool through and through as carragher is.

from what i read i think most fans would prefer cahill

does that make him a better centre back than cahill ?

Cahill, he's been in the premierleague for a long time, understands everything and is a good solid CB.

Cahill twice on sunday!!! technically better and more comfortable on the ball. Quicker and has the tendency to drift forward.

Dann is better in the air but quite inept with the ball at his feet.

If we want to play a higher defensive line and a higher tempo pressure game, i think Cahill is better.

I would not know who to choose between both of them. I seldom get to see them in action in a full game. But according to reports that I read in the internet , it seems like Dann will have more passion if he plays for the club as he is a known Liverpool fan. If according to reputation , I believe Cahill is rated higher than Dann. Chelsea , Arsenal and Scums were after him after a wonderful season with Bolton. Would love to have both at the same time but if only given a choice of 1 player , it would be Cahill over Dann. I would based choice on reputations...


Just My Thoughts
YNWA...

not a huge fan of either, but i'd have cahill everytime

Not better, just different. To me, it's like asking who is better out of Agger or Carra. Technically Agger is better, but if I got to choose out of the both of them, I'd probably want Carra. This is in assumption that Dann is a true Liverpool supporter. That mixed with his all out fighting approach makes me like Sann.

But at the end of the day it's a hard choice. Agger isn't fit most of the time it seems, so in some way it would be good to get Cahill to replace him, cause they are more similar. But if Agger (in an ideal world) stays fit, then it would be nice to get Dann, to eventually take over from Carra, who isn't getting younger.