KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 11 of 11 1 2 … 9 10 11
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
A moral one not a legal one?
i think both but moral is the correct move i think .


Well there is no legal obligation unless it’s negotiated as part of the new ground build. If I am wrong show me a link to the appropriate local government regulations. Moral obligation why just because once a fortnight there is a little disruption how do residents get on living near to the Trafford Centre? Like I say the club has been there since 1892. Another thing to bear in mind all this funding for the local residents will not be free it will be passed directly onto match ticket prices. We have enough trouble paying for the ludicrous wage demands of the players without subsidising the local council taxpayers as well.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
A moral one not a legal one?
i think both but moral is the correct move i think .


Well there is no legal obligation unless it’s negotiated as part of the new ground build. If I am wrong show me a link to the appropriate local government regulations. Moral obligation why just because once a fortnight there is a little disruption how do residents get on living near to the Trafford Centre? Like I say the club has been there since 1892. Another thing to bear in mind all this funding for the local residents will not be free it will be passed directly onto match ticket prices. We have enough trouble paying for the ludicrous wage demands of the players without subsidising the local council taxpayers as well.
i think LFC is more than a little distruption , and you mention 1892 well i dont think the club were buying up streets in its first 50-60 years and leaving them in disrepair for years and years .

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
A moral one not a legal one?
i think both but moral is the correct move i think .


Well there is no legal obligation unless it’s negotiated as part of the new ground build. If I am wrong show me a link to the appropriate local government regulations. Moral obligation why just because once a fortnight there is a little disruption how do residents get on living near to the Trafford Centre? Like I say the club has been there since 1892. Another thing to bear in mind all this funding for the local residents will not be free it will be passed directly onto match ticket prices. We have enough trouble paying for the ludicrous wage demands of the players without subsidising the local council taxpayers as well.
i think LFC is more than a little distruption , and you mention 1892 well i dont think the club were buying up streets in its first 50-60 years and leaving them in disrepair for years and years .


No but in 1910 175,000 people turned up with flat caps on bikes they must have noticed that.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 100
S
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
S Offline
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 100
Yeah if we brought ticket prices down I think we could fill a 90k stadium, also I think if we do move from Anfield it would be nice to see it changed into a sport complex.

Page 11 of 11 1 2 … 9 10 11

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion