KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum nzobia vs young

It depends on the way we'll be playing.

Young is right footed, but plays mainly on the left of 3 man forward line.

N'Zogbia is left footed and had some experience in playing as an attacking LB in Newcastle. he's the ideal Wingback in a 352 formation, or a hardworking left midfielder in a 442 formation.

I believe N'Zogbia is a better and cheaper option.

Tough call between the two to be honest, I think Young hasn't performed aswell as he has done over previous seasons where N'Zogbia has done well over the past 6 months. I think they are equal

Honestly I think you lot are kidding yourself just because we are more likely to get him ahead of N'zogbia. Big teams are interested in young not n'zogbia, doesn't that tell you something? Young can play behind the striker, on the left or on the right, has amazing vision, a few different aspects to his game. N'zogbia is a very limited left sided player that is doing well at a club that just managed to stay up. If he is in the first 11, next season we will be desperate for another winger and this will be money wasted as his attitude stinks and he will be even worse than a midtabler player when he isnt getting game time.

none of them, either Muller or Hazard would be excellent on the wings.

villa were not that far away from going down (i knw houiller had health problems) but the amount of england internationals they have its no excuse, should be easier to look good compared to N'zogbia were only mccarthy in that midfield is of any quality

read all the post from the other users, your the only one that thinks young is twice the player. most people seem to think they are roughly the same and a few prefer one over the other but no one else seems to think there is day and night difference between them. you are in the minority my friend

dont watch wigan or villa enuf to judge, but young seems to fancy going to the scum so dont see any point getting worked up over it

I think they are sort of identical but my preference is N'zogbia for a few reasons, one is that he will be cheaper and also he is a left footer and we really need someone giving some nice service down the left, I think both of them play on either flank either but Young is more central (free role) similar to Meireles and thats what kinda puts me off because we have several players than can play there. N'Zogbia for me.

You can whip out a childish wink face if you want but I'm not in the minority as football extends further than this forum if you hadn't noticed and if you ventured into these other areas you might be a bit more well informed. Young is far better than N'zogbia, proof in the pudding he is wanted by Utd and N'zogbia is wanted by Newcastle. If you asked anyone connected with football, any coach etc they would tell you young is a much more technically gifted player it is genuinely very obvious. If nothing else you can surely see N'zogbia is a very limited player. wise up soft lad and don't take an internet forum as gospel.

and how many coaches do you personally know? am guess not a lot if any ( yr friend that manages a pub team doesnt count). pretty much all my friends are liverpool fans and they all agree there isnt too much difference between them. i also browse through other forums and they seem to have a similar views. and so what if utd want him, they also wanted Massimo Taibi and obatan. both utd and chelsea where fighting over freddy abu and looked how that turned out.
thinking young is better isnt a problem but to think his twice the player is stupid. messi, ronaldo, iniesta YES, ashley young NO