'torres is from madrid and supported (and played for) atletico. he moved to liverpool for money and glory.'
Not really as Torres took a pay cut to come to Liverpool, and he didn't win anything during his 42 months at the club
well i'm sure when he left madrid that he couldn't have forseen the fact that our club would baulk in the transfer market so badly under gillet and hicks and that the club would so grossly mismanagaged. also at the end of his 42 months at LFC he was earning far more than any other atletico player was at that point. In fact by his second season at LFC, he was earning more than he was being paid when he left atletico.
his autobiography (as anyone's) is always going to talk about how much he loves the club he's currently playing for. as for the 'i'm 100% committed' etc, i never really buy that anyway.
there is rarely a day goes by in the news where some footballer doesn't commit 100% to the club. and they so often back track. i'm not saying it's good, but i am saying that this is the modern game. we are sold spin on websites, newspapers in order to sell ads. in other words, i personally took torres leaving with a grain of salt.
i beleive that the hurt wasn't necessarily about the manner in whihc he left but more that he went to a rival or ours that's higher up the table. it was confirmation that after years of bad leadership (at board, ownership, and to a lesser extent at managerial level), that we were no longer a top 4 club. and that a club who operate under the assumption that they will be in the top 4, ie chelsea, were able to take him from us. i beleive his leaving was a manifestation of things that have been happening at the club for 20 years.
so when he next visits anfield as a chelsea player, would i show him how i feel? of course i would. but i wouldn't be boo-ing him or opening him with welcome arms either. he's just someone who scored sh**loads of goals for us, gave us a £26m profit and then went to another club. i don't see the issue. still.