The facts are he's had 4 managers. Out of those 4 managers none of them. Let me repeat none of them think he's good enough.
LOL! You've proved my point, by repeating the same garbage AGAIN! How many more times do you need to type that, you still aren't convicing anyone. I've already answered that question so why are you saying it again.
* Rafa rated him and clearly from what he said before he left felt Dani was ready for more 1st team football next season. FACT.
* Hodgson rated and persisted with Konchesky who was clearly out of his depth so he's hardly one with great judgement. In fact no-one even cared what he thought in the end, they just wanted rid of him. FACT.
* Kenny rated Pacheco enough to have him on the bench ahead of Jovanovich. FACT.
* The 4th manager being the Norwich manager doesn't count as it's sheer desperation on your part just to add another manager to your boring repetitious argument. FACT.
Remember that this time last year Jay Spearing was struggling to hold down a regular start at Leicester and certainly wasn't impressing too many when he did play. So saying Pacheco will never be good enough holds no water whatsoever. This is an unsettled matter until he gets more games for us next season, or leaves the club.
Anyway I'm done with this argument. We get it Murph, you don't rate Pacheco. Fine. You sure post a lot about him for a guy who's totally written him off in a red shirt. In the meantime, I'll continue to update the thread of his development.
