Nobody said you couldnt disagree with anybody but you do tend to talk rubbish so therefore cant be taken that seriously.
i dont talk rubbish
its just i think we ignore talent because it might be a bit risky to have a couple of teenagers on the pitch because they're not solid and dependable, id prefer to have 2/3 young talents on the pitch rather than the solid dependable type player
These kids you bang on about arent in the squad let alone the team because their either not good enough or ready. Just because you see glimpses of what they can do that makes you think they should be playing. The staff at melwood watch theses lads on a daily basis. Can you not understand that?
thats the thing when are they going to be ready? because the reserve league in this country is sh!t and it'll never get anyone ready for PL football so what we wait until they're 25? maybe they're not ready maybe some of them aren't good enough but id rather see a youngster having games where they are out of their depth, games where they get bullied all over the pitch, because i have faith in that fact that a few of these lads will get through that period and come through the other side as very good players. jack wilshere still has games where he gets bullied like he did against man city not so long ago does that mean he isn't ready or he isnt good enough. if you look at our 2 main players the players all other youngsters get compared too gerrard and carragher, did you hear the stories behind they're débuts ? they both had a lot of luck, and look how they turned out after that, players like maxi poulsen and 'the greek' their careers are finished only downhill form here on in, players like pacheco, ayala have talent and spearing is as good as poulsen and could do a lot of improving. all i have been saying is that id rather have a youngster with talent who might not be ready playing than have these old rubbish players on the pitch,
we will never agree on this murph we are polar opposites on this subject
