Torres was a top player for us and was well on his way to becoming a legend
QFT. Torres was one of the last 4 when it came to selecting LFC Hall of Fame players for the 2000-2009 period, despite only playing 3 of those 10 seasons, and I have to think he got more votes than Sami simply because he broke every club scoring record he qualified for. But it's just as well he didn't get more votes than Carra, eh?
You have to stop thinking that his ambition made him a bad player - if anything it made him the fantastic player he was for us, and will be for Chelsea if they can work out how to incorporate him into their system.
Suarez is not a "better" player than Torres, nor is he worse. He is simply different. He fits the forward playmaker role that Torres failed at, and it's why he's had an immediate impact.
He's a very tricky runner and excels at dribbling, so pass-and-move is perfect for him as it highlights all his strengths. If only we could actually pass the ball a bit more - we only ever seem to do it with any facility when we're running the clock down in a won game (eg the 3rd goal vs Wolves). We're miles off the way Chelsea pass the ball and support each other in midfield, and that really bothers me because I would have thought Kenny would have instilled this system by now, particularly with the 5-a-side games. What is it we aren't learning?