Playing to the gallery having a go at Chelsea that ticks a lot of boxes for the naive. The key thing was that he hinting not investing in the club by tarting the present old ground up. That’s what matters it was a very concerning interview for me. We may have exchanged one owner without resources for another.
I think I'm far from naive - when last did we have owners who actually had a go at the way the owners of others clubs conduct their business? For the record all I have to go on are a few snippets from this interview (as you may have realized had you read my entire post).
Henry has always played his cards close to his chest. Maybe that says "skint" to you, but to me it says "man who is intelligent enough to think first before the media crucify him about some supposed promise". He's not promising things, and I don't know if you've had a look at the way the club is being run, but it seems to me (admittedly from very far away) that he's simply delivering instead. He's always said that he wanted the club to be self-sufficient as it is the most effective business model (which I think is something pretty much everyone agrees on), and now you're upset because he's putting his words into action? How many times have the supporters said we didn't want a sugar daddy, but that we wanted someone who would grow the club? You seem to want the sugar daddy as well, and it's like you've just woken up that's not who he is nor what he wants.