|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
the issue of staying or going will have massive impact on the anfield and breckfield area with the EU funding for the regeneration being lost if LFC stay on site , which for me and the city is a massive issue the club must take on with the club being such a massive business in the area it must keep its obligation to the area I agree, cant help thinking if the new stadium is'nt built it will be like the Club has royaly shafted the people Anfield. Imagine how you would feel having been told this and that will happen to your area to make it better, getting shown plans and models of how it would look and then the next day saying sorry but you wont be getting that now as we are staying where we are, I think it's terrible how the residents of Anfield look to be being treated, by these Americans. i agree if the club stay at the prescent anfield they MUST keep there promises to the areas of anfield and breckfield with the regeneration of the areaas the city council need LFC to keep to there obligations for its neighbours.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Strange thread, and a few wild theories.
To fazakerley's point about the area suffering because a new stadium won't be built there. Yes that might be true, but it is not Liverpool FC's job to regenerate an area. sorry your very wrong it is its a massive business that effects the whole area LFC have a duty to the people of anfield and breckfield as well as the city and moving to the new development in stanley park was promised and it brought funding from the EU and the government and the city but it needs LFC to keep it obligation to its neighbours and staying at the prescent anfield could seriously damage that .
Last edited by fazakerley red 1; 05/02/11 06:11 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
moving to the new development in stanley park was promised and it brought funding from the EU and the government and the city but it need LFC to obligation to its neighbours . Promised by who, though? by the club through planning and getting the funding ETC
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046 |
Yep its those evil americans again! Things don't get given to you in life on a plate unless you know Roman AbramoRich so why do you expect to have a 400 billion stadium built ? They never promised to build anything. There is a lot of support for keeping the stadium in anycase. I don't think a new stadium is the solution to our ills. We need a good management set up and a supportive board and it looks like we could have that.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
this was from the days of parry and moores and planning permission has been given for a stadium and infrastructure , that gives the anfield and breckfield areas the funding for regeneration , now if LFC stay at the prescent anfield this funding will be lost to the people
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
if you dont believe what i am saying e mail joe anderson or Steve Rotheram M.P. and they will tell you the club has a duty to the people of anfield and breckfield if any redevoplement goes ahead .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
but he is the owner and the club has a duty to its neighbours , IE if you lived by a massive factory of a massively wealth business like a LFC you would expect that company to have a duty to the surrounding areas and LFC has to keep up this it cant just wash it hands of the local people .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
I would expect a business to employ local people, which Liverpool do, and to try to increase employment, which redevelping anfield will hopefully do, and contribute taxes so that the council and government can do their job ind eveloping areas, which Liverpool FC do. That's the only duty I see. Everyone pays their taxes to the government and they also pay to the european union. The money that is promised to LIverpool by the EU is actually already your money, it's been taken by politicians, who then grant it back to you. It is their job to improve things, not Liverpools. That's why they receive taxes. no mate the issue is if LFC dont move the funding goes and the anfield breckfield area is left the whole lot was around the stanley park scheme and the club whoever the owners are cannot just wash there hands of it if its to stay and upgrade the prescent anfield .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 63
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 63 |
I agree, cant help thinking if the new stadium is'nt built it will be like the Club has royaly shafted the people Anfield. Imagine how you would feel having been told this and that will happen to your area to make it better, getting shown plans and models of how it would look and then the next day saying sorry but you wont be getting that now as we are staying where we are, I think it's terrible how the residents of Anfield look to be being treated, by these Americans. Imagine how i'd feel? It is how all Liverpool fans have felt since Hicks and Gillett took over and we were promised a spade in the ground within 60 days or something. That was Hicks and Gillett's plan, and their promises, and their agreement with the council. The stadium should already be nearly built by now. None of that is the fault of Henry or LFC. was'nt it specified and in the package that whoever took over the Club was obliged to pick up the reins of building a new stadium, thats what that Chinese feller and the one from the middle east both had in there blueprints for the Club when they tried to buy it before the Americans ended up with it..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046 |
Stupid question i know but.........is there a reason why we cannot just adda new tier to one of the stands at the ground like before. I am looking at an aerial photo of the stadium. (I have never been inside anfield so sorry for the stupid question)
|
|
|
|
|
