KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 11 12
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
this post was not about the increasing of the capacity ETC its about the non moving to stanley park and the effect it has on the anfield and breckfield districts , because a lot of EU money is tied into the stadium development not the regeneration of the main stand , i do believe as a massive business in the area its has a massive obligation to it neighbours that it should up hold .

Last edited by fazakerley red 1; 04/02/11 09:50 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
this post was not about the increasing of the capacity ETC its about the non moving to stanley park and the effect it has on the anfield and breckfield districts , because a lot of EU money is tied into the stadium development not the regeneration of the main stand , i do believe as a massive business in the area its has a massive obligation to it neighbours that it should up hold .


I don't think Stanley Park was the right place anyway. BUT I take your point and its a good one. If they are tarting up Anfield this has big implications for Liverpool because the Stanley Park development was part of a much wider scheme.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
I THINK THERE IS MORE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT AT ANFIELD THEN WE THINK OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE LOOKING INTO IT

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
Originally Posted By: House M.D
I THINK THERE IS MORE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT AT ANFIELD THEN WE THINK OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE LOOKING INTO IT
staying at the present anfield causes loads of funding issues for the anfield and breckfield area for its regeneration which was tied into the stadium project .

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: House M.D
I THINK THERE IS MORE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT AT ANFIELD THEN WE THINK OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE LOOKING INTO IT


There is more room but its very limited. And by the way putting text in capitals and bold does not make your point more valid.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,239
J
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,239
I think your being a bit harsh on the owners stanley. They were voted by the fans as the second best owners in MLB. He wouldn't get this accolade if he was doing things the fans didn't agree with

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Jammer
I think your being a bit harsh on the owners stanley. They were voted by the fans as the second best owners in MLB. He wouldn't get this accolade if he was doing things the fans didn't agree with


Liverpool FC is a different situation to Redsox. This is a global club totally different market culture. Yes maybe I am being a bit harsh but I care and I am worried they will go cut price to minimise their risk and maximise their capital gain short term in other word use us and milk us. Its not happened yet but you remember my words Jammer!!!!!!!!!


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 161
A
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 161
Can we have an anti negative police set up , We have just smashed 2 records on fees for players , We have the Manager we want and asked for we have an investment of some sort for the ground which is yet to be decided.I would say as well forget expanding anything until we start filling Anfield time for fans to give back as well it works both ways. I not knocking anyone just adding that I am sick of people finding something to moan about when finnally things are looking up.
They are not the ones who promised to "build the sucker" give them time and sorry but Football is a buisness now and anybody who buys because they love the club is skint look at Everton , Abramovich does not count because he is not a fan and he is a weirdo anyway

Last edited by andrex; 04/02/11 11:56 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Nothing negative about wanting Liverpool FC to be the best in the world. Thats postive very postive and those who want second best then maybe the negative police go after them. Unless Liverpool have a top stadium to match Man Utd, Barcelona, Aresnal etc then we will be in the second tier. For all time! It will not matter a jot who the manager is or who we sign that second rate stadium will forever hold us back. For well over a decade now Man Utd have taken more than u in gate money and are millions ahead of us each year in turnover. With the new FA rules its even more vital we have that turnover. Sticking your head in the sand is not an option I wish it was.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 107
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 107
If you don't have a team that is winning you can forget about filling any sort of stadium. I think NESVs first goal is to build a successful team that established fans and new fans want to support and want to go to Anfield and support.

I think a lot of this thread is built of speculation and Im sure NESV have plans for Anfield. Just look at the red sox stadium

Page 4 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 11 12

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion