Anyone else noticed that Off site have taken down the statement from earlier re: Lifting of restraint?
Eeeeeeeeeeeek!!!!!
Because the restraining order has not been lifted - Hicks must apply to the court for that, and they will convene at 1pm local time in the US.
I wonder several things:
1. Will the judge charge Hicks with deliberately misleading the court when apply for the injunction?
2. If he sells his shares to Mill, surely the fact that he arranged the sale while the injunction was in place is contempt of court?
3. Can he even sell his shares without the board's approval, as well as the FA's Fit Owner test of Mill Financial? If they must go through the test prior to the sale of shares, surely RBS can repossess Kop Holdings first?
4. If he does sell his shares, the binding agreement to sell the club to NESV still stands as long as RBS do not accept repayment of the loan from Mill, but does RBS even have a right to refuse the payment?
But most importantly, 5. Why hasn't the board applied for a restraining order against Hicks?