|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
I just prefer all players to have time together to build good partnerships. Rotating now and then to refresh players is fine. If you do it week in week out just for the sake of it isn’t good for me.
Just my humble opinion which I’m entitled to which by the way doesn’t have to be the same as yours. Never said your opinion has to be the same as mine because this is a debate forum. What's the use of saying others opinions are negative or miserable or brain dead etc? Coming back to rotation, my opinion is if you put a player who hasn't played in the team for a long time, chances that he would gel will be lower while with rotation (if the players are of similar level) they all get used to play together. If teams were playing only 1 game a week, then maybe rotation would be damaging, but with the number of games in the cups and league, it's more 2 games a week, so rotation can still allow players to get used to each other. We did it in midfield this year and City did it in both midfield and attack, maybe this is why in terms of freshness these 2 teams were above others. No you just call people a fukking idiot if it isn’t the same as yours. I’m not sure City rotated their front men/man. Aguero played 33 times for them in the league with 31 starts. Jesus played 29 games with just 8 starts. Sterling started 31 games, David Silva 28, the other Silva 31. That’s the bulk of games for those more attacking players. Our midfield was changed quite a bit and we suffered sometimes with bad combinations. But I feel it was more through necessity of injuries and bad form than anything else. Fabinho took time to get going as did Keita through injury. Hendo was injured a bit too. The only one who played the bulk of our games was Gini. We will always need to rotate so better players to do that with is important but it still shouldn’t be a regular thing just for the sake of it. The 'fking stupid' part has been a response to fking miserable, don't know why one is worse than the other, they are same to me. Regarding the number of games, you shouldn't forget the cups including CL.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
No it’s just you being abusive as usual. You are miserable and the fukking was used to emphasise how miserable. I could e said really really miserable or massively miserable. All three mean the same thing. That you’re miserable.
Last edited by wilkij1975; 22/05/19 04:26 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
No it’s just you being abusive as usual. You are miserable and the fukking was used to emphasise how miserable. I could e said really really miserable or massively miserable. All three mean the same thing. That you’re miserable.
So must be your class that make you use fking instead of really really or massively then. Nothing miserable to see things before you, which is not difficult I must say
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
fukkk me Vish,it's not about class,it's just the beauty of the English language.
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
fukkk me Vish,it's not about class,it's just the beauty of the English language. If you say so....fking beautiful, right? I learned English at school in Mauritius, so a bit different I suppose
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
fukkk me Vish,it's not about class,it's just the beauty of the English language. If you say so....fking beautiful, right? I learned English at school in Mauritius, so a bit different I suppose Nothing to do with your English. More about how ignorant you are towards others. I used to put it down to the language barrier but not any more.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
fukkk me Vish,it's not about class,it's just the beauty of the English language. If you say so....fking beautiful, right? I learned English at school in Mauritius, so a bit different I suppose Nothing to do with your English. More about how ignorant you are towards others. I used to put it down to the language barrier but not any more. Could say exactly the same to you except the language part
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
I’m not ignorant towards others. I just disagree. I don’t get patronising or insulting. I tell it how it is. You’re miserable. That’s not an insult. It’s a fact. Calling someone fukking stupid is an insult.
Also making a judgement of someone’s social class based on language is also pretty damn ignorant. As if posh people don’t swear! And this is because you think you’re superior in some way. More ignorance.
Anyway, City in the ECL, Sterling played 10 games, Aguero 6 so again, the bulk of those games. It looks like they mixed it up in the domestic cups just as we did. So it doesn’t look to me that they rotated for the sake of it as you seem to be suggesting we should do.
We will always need to rest players to keep them fresh which is where we need better than Origi or Sturridge who we only used when there was no choice. I’m pretty sure we’ll get someone. I see the front page has an up date on Werner and that our interest is genuine. I’m not sure we would spend that much but you never know.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
I’m not ignorant towards others. I just disagree. I don’t get patronising or insulting. I tell it how it is. You’re miserable. That’s not an insult. It’s a fact. Calling someone fukking stupid is an insult.
Also making a judgement of someone’s social class based on language is also pretty damn ignorant. As if posh people don’t swear! And this is because you think you’re superior in some way. More ignorance.
Anyway, City in the ECL, Sterling played 10 games, Aguero 6 so again, the bulk of those games. It looks like they mixed it up in the domestic cups just as we did. So it doesn’t look to me that they rotated for the sake of it as you seem to be suggesting we should do.
We will always need to rest players to keep them fresh which is where we need better than Origi or Sturridge who we only used when there was no choice. I’m pretty sure we’ll get someone. I see the front page has an up date on Werner and that our interest is genuine. I’m not sure we would spend that much but you never know. Social class? What are you talking about, I said Class, as in you have (actually don't) class (being outstandin or great style) with your language. Regarding rotation for City, it really hit me while playing fantasy football and players were constantly changed. This article might shed some light. And yes, I have been saying for at least 6 months we need more classy players to rotate with our attackers, not for the sake of rotation, but to keep players fresh by also maintaining the same level https://sportstar.thehindu.com/football/...cle24668380.ece
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054 |
We currently have 3 top strikers who our regular first team players if they are available, if we say PL & CL is our top priority, they cannot play 100% of these games as they will burn out/get injuries/off form etc.
If we bring in another striker equivalent to these 3 quality wise, lets say Brandt for example, that means we have 4 first teams strikers, each player could then play 75% of these games, which is realistic unless you get 1 player out with a bad injury, so it is not like we have 1 player sat on the bench all season.
|
|
|
|
|
